Very much so, in his time at Liverpool he’s finished behind loads of average managers. Conte, Poch,Ten Haag, Lole, Howe, Arteta, I’m guessing there’s others. He conspired to lose two CL finals, lose to Seville in the Europe. People go on like it’s been nip and tick with City. They finished fucking 5th season.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media Discussion - 2023/24
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
Very much so, in his time at Liverpool he’s finished behind loads of average managers. Conte, Poch,Ten Haag, Lole, Howe, Arteta, I’m guessing there’s others. He conspired to lose two CL finals, lose to Seville in the Europe. People go on like it’s been nip and tick with City. They finished fucking 5th season.
WTF has come over Danny!
I do think that quite a few will be sick to the back teeth of this Klopp/scouse love in.
Spurs quarter 69
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 1,619
- Team supported
- City and Fleetwood Town
Player doesn't seem like Beckham or Giggs at the same age ans he is a manc.The writer or the player, give us a clue ;-)
Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
Don't know whether this comes under the heading of "media" or not but with my limited knowledge of civil law etc. How come videos like this are not considered libelous (or defamatory) nothing is proven as far as I know yet these videos remain online stating we have cheated 100%, no if's or but's.
I'm a wee bit puzzled how they can state someone is guilty before anything is proven.
I'm a wee bit puzzled how they can state someone is guilty before anything is proven.
gray740
Well-Known Member
Don't know whether this comes under the heading of "media" or not but with my limited knowledge of civil law etc. How come videos like this are not considered libelous (or defamatory) nothing is proven as far as I know yet these videos remain online stating we have cheated 100%, no if's or but's.
I'm a wee bit puzzled how they can state someone is guilty before anything is proven.
Sky and talkshite get away with it on a daily basis so hey ho free for all ,just popped sky shite on and same shit talking about chelsea but really us 115 mentioned at least ten times in 5 minutes ,got to say I am really tired of these cnuts. You tubers are no nowt click bait shit but Beeb sky Itv jesus christ ,and they all have so called journalists on talking shite tired of it ..
gray740
Well-Known Member
I try but its everywhere I used to like hearing footy news I avoid anything but live matchday now and that is kick off time only .There’s lots of this stuff floating around, I personally ignore it.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
Don't know whether this comes under the heading of "media" or not but with my limited knowledge of civil law etc. How come videos like this are not considered libelous (or defamatory) nothing is proven as far as I know yet these videos remain online stating we have cheated 100%, no if's or but's.
I'm a wee bit puzzled how they can state someone is guilty before anything is proven.
Another hit piece. The Author is nameless. All we know is that he/she/bot spouts lies about city from Norway. No factual evidence presented, but rather a run through of the charges with his/her/bot interpretation.
Follow the money and it will lead to a dip/rag crying into their duvet.
Misinformation presented as facts when really it’s nothing but spin to declare guilt. No evidence tho to back any of it up.
Scroll past and let the lemmings enjoy.
Don't know whether this comes under the heading of "media" or not but with my limited knowledge of civil law etc. How come videos like this are not considered libelous (or defamatory) nothing is proven as far as I know yet these videos remain online stating we have cheated 100%, no if's or but's.
I'm a wee bit puzzled how they can state someone is guilty before anything is proven.
More click bait shite. Had a quick glance of that channel and it is from a red dipper.