Mourinho quitting? (merged)

Re: Mourinho

Stood in The South Stand said:
I would put my house on this not happening. The media are trying to pile the pressure on Mancini in suggesting he has to win the league or he's gone. It's bollocks in my opinion.
What if it was the other way around? With manchini deciding to leave so he can spend more time with his ill father, winning the league would seal his time with city a success, and allow him to move on. I hope not.
 
Damocles said:
BillyShears said:
Damocles said:
I have never spoken to anybody outside of this forum who claims that this is true. Even at the time I asked around and everybody said that it was complete bollocks. This forum seems to be the only place where this is taken as a fact.

I know where the information came from, originally, and more to the point I know why it came out. Let's just say that lots of political manoeuvring was happening at this time and it made lots of sense for certain people to drop this into the press pack. Even then, most of them didn't bite because they saw through it. I raised my objections to the original poster of this in a PM (using more direct language) when it came out and we pretty much agreed that this was brinkmanship rather than actual reality.

The Mancini to Juventus story was high profile enough for him to be asked directly in a press conference whether he had spoken to them about their job, which to be fair he did flatly deny. The point I was making in the above post is that both Mourinho and Mancini are highly political beasts. Mancini and Cook/Marwood had major disagreements about something as both sides were briefing the press towards the end of last season. Funnily enough, it was almost a parallel of the Valdano/Mou situation at Real Madrid. Both managers won those particular battles.

Totally agree, Mancini is the most political astute manager that I'd ever seen. Let's not forget that he pretty much ran Sampdoria when he played there, even sitting in on interviews for the manager position. He knows how to play the game.

People think I was been sarcastic or something before, but I'm not.

If Mancini doesn't win the league, we should sack him and appoint Mourinho.

From this position, anything other than the title would be termed a failure. IF Mourinho wasn't available, I'd totally support keeping Mancini onboard and as always, I'd back him 100%.

But we aren't in the same position as we were two years ago, or even a year ago. I didn't want Mou then as I don't think that he had the necessary attributes to build a squad in the same way that Mancini does. Mou is a cake decorator, not a baker.

Let's be totally honest here; does anyone think that Mourinho would fail to win the league from where we are now?

If it was any other manager in the world, I'd pick Mancini, but Mourinho will bring us instant success and the "project" (which is bigger than Tevez, bigger than Cook, bigger than Mancini and bigger than Mourinho) needs the league as the next logical step in its progression.

I used to want us to sit and do things the right way; to appoint a man that will create a dynasty here. The disorganisation of the youth->first team progression has made me see that this is a big job which needs someone at board level to grab hold of it.

We have time to sort out the youth and that later, the Sheikh doesn't appear to be going anywhere. Right now, for the good of the club and the progression of our growth (financial, football and marketing wise) we need a title.

Mancini has his shot at it this year. I have nothing but 100% faith in the man that he will deliver.

Yeap agree with what you are saying here. But just feel that sacking Mancini if he were not to win the title would be harsh and not broad-minded. It would be too result-oriented like how Chelsea have been. Our youth will just never get a chance to grow and develop under a proper manager that way. Just look at mourinho. He leaves when he feel like it and despite him being brilliant, it might almost be like a carlos tevez situation with him. let me put it this way. bobby is like Aguero to me, not the best yet but has shown signs of tremendous potential. While, Mourinho is like carlos tevez an incredible goal scorer and winner at every club where he has gone. Id prefer Bobby to Mourinho in the same manner despite the pedigree of the latter. Sure Mourinho, like Carlos, might single-handedly win the PL for us. But is that really worth rejecting an aguero for a carlos or a mancini for a mourinho. Im really happy with what we have.
 
Re: Mourinho

bermudian goat said:
I think most would agree that mourinho is a better manager then manchini, he would undoubtly make us win more even if his style of football comes into question, however the real debate his will the manger who replaces mourinho when he fancies his next 'challange' be a better manager than manchini, if were not careful we would probably end up with the likes of twitcher. With stability and support even when things go against him, like getting knocked out of 3 cups, im sure manchini will prosper and go down in history and eclipse the succsess of mourinho with gods own club.

Our manager is called Mancini , whats yours called?
 
Jumanji said:
Only on BlueMoon do you find this much Mourinho wanking.

Just so wrong I don't even know where to begin.

Firstly, the overwhelmingly vast majority don't seem to want him, certainly if this thread is anything to by. Secondly, even those who rate him believe that Mancini will still be City manager even if he doesn't win the league this season unless HE decides to leave to go back to Italy.

So tell me, who's doing the wanking ?
 
BillyShears said:
Jumanji said:
Only on BlueMoon do you find this much Mourinho wanking.

Just so wrong I don't even know where to begin.

Firstly, the overwhelmingly vast majority don't seem to want him, certainly if this thread is anything to by. Secondly, even those who rate him believe that Mancini will still be City manager even if he doesn't win the league this season unless HE decides to leave to go back to Italy.

So tell me, who's doing the wanking ?


Billy...I've got those tissues you wanted.. ;)
 
Re: Mourinho

Lucky13 said:
bermudian goat said:
I think most would agree that mourinho is a better manager then manchini, he would undoubtly make us win more even if his style of football comes into question, however the real debate his will the manger who replaces mourinho when he fancies his next 'challange' be a better manager than manchini, if were not careful we would probably end up with the likes of twitcher. With stability and support even when things go against him, like getting knocked out of 3 cups, im sure manchini will prosper and go down in history and eclipse the succsess of mourinho with gods own club.

Our manager is called Mancini , whats yours called?
rooney lol
 
samharris said:
BillyShears said:
Jumanji said:
Only on BlueMoon do you find this much Mourinho wanking.

Just so wrong I don't even know where to begin.

Firstly, the overwhelmingly vast majority don't seem to want him, certainly if this thread is anything to by. Secondly, even those who rate him believe that Mancini will still be City manager even if he doesn't win the league this season unless HE decides to leave to go back to Italy.

So tell me, who's doing the wanking ?


Billy...I've got those tissues you wanted.. ;)

Haha. In a thread about Mou you can better your bottom dollar I won't be the one in need of tissues. Maybe review some of contributions and you may find a better recipient.... ;)
 
bluecityboy said:
Don't want him. It won't happen especially with the new CEO coming on board.
You think Garry cook had hire and fire responsibility of the manager?!? As if!!!!

That decision would come from Abu dhabi alone. And, even if it was a factor(which it won't be) his previous 'rejection' of mourinho was based on barca's culture-a very different one to ours.

If getting mourinho means losing the title this year then I don't want him, no matter how perfect I believe he is for us
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.