SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 51,868
I think part of it was that the final step was well past and partly in front of the ball, meaning the ball couldn’t actually be struck straight forward (as the taker’s leading foot would block the ball), and being able to step in front of the ball gave the attacker unfair advantage.Suppose the boring answer is it’s subjective and entirely up to the referee’s interpretation.
But it sounds to me more like they thought he’d completed the run up, rather than he actually had completed it. So if there was no pause between the final step and striking the ball, it’s fine and the fact the final step was past the ball was just a distracting irrelevance.
I am genuinely curious if a PL referee would allow that sort of penalty (should a PL player be bold enough to try it).