PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Pontypool Blue said:
Is anyone else finding 115 boring?
It's like a high score that you can't better.
I think it's about high time that more charges were added weekly maybe getting it up a more user friendly 250 for example by Christmas and then maybe a small lift at the End of January when the credit card bill is in, to say 300.
We could have a counter outside the ground that is like the countdown to Christmas but in reverse, make sure there is enough room for 4 digits though (We don't wan't to make the same mistake that nearly ended the world in 1999!)

Finally in 2050 after we have reached net zero and Putin is pulling his OAP's out of Ukraine someone at City will issue a cease or desist notice to the PL!
Click to expand...
There’s a banner with a ticking year just on the outskirts of Manchester that’s no longer in use, could we use that???
 
"Roberto Mancini... were all your payments by Manchester City compliant with FFP rules?"

"Yes"

blackadder-hugh-laurie.gif
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
When you feel jaded around all this nonsense, just remember that the announcement of these charges spurred us on to winning the treble.

Wonder what the PL will throw at us in February next year to help us on our way.
Click to expand...
Maybe they’ll try reverse psychology by finding us not guilty and hoping it deflates us!!
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
When you feel jaded around all this nonsense, just remember that the announcement of these charges spurred us on to winning the treble.

Wonder what the PL will throw at us in February next year to help us on our way.
Click to expand...
100% this ^

It was the greatest inspiration possible at the best possible time, we looked a tired, old team last autumn, these charges were the perfect "pep" up and ended in a glorious treble.

Without doubt the finest own goal from the red shirts in living memory.
 
citizen_maine said:
When did this happen
Click to expand...
UEFA Case: One of the charges was for non cooperation. City had refused to cooperate with the UEFA Investigative Chamber led by Yves Leterme, former disgraced Belgian PM. Leterme was accused by City of leaking information from the confidential investigation. When found guilty by UEFA they appealed to CAS. They then appealed to CAS claiming that because UEFA had broken their protocol, the case against them should be terminated. CAS however, although accepting the reasons, couldn't terminate the UEFA case / City appeal as it hadn't been heard. When it was heard, CAS reduced the fine for non-cooperation from e30M to e10M as they agreed with City but, due to City having admitted non-cooperation couldn't reject the charge The amount of the fine was noted as being due to City's considerable resources.

City have done a similar process with the PL financial investigation, see above for details

Incidentally Leterme was the gentleman who forgot to charge PSG in time and therefore their breaches went unpunished Following the CAS case verdict Leterme left UEFA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.