You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 8,692
This is the stupidity that we're up against with some rival fans. "Go back to the drawing board and come up with something that stops Newcastle, and stops Man City, but doesn't hurt the rest of us". FFS.
Everton …… “we voted for it to impact City not us, that’s not fair, it’s corrupt!”
Yeah. Some do but there are some who are too thick to understand the issue & have never read the CAS report for example ( Spitty for one & most Sky pundits) so as a result, most opposition fans haven’t a clue about any of it & just believe what they hear.They do understand @CC1 , they just choose to ignore the point as it doesn't fit their narrative..
I actually think that the idiot Jordan believes we’re guilty but again, it’s because he hasn’t read any of the official paperwork. You can tell when he’s in discussions with Stefan - he just spouts the standard nonsense but is never asked to back it up with real facts.
Excellent take on the situation. The only legal expert they can get on is Stefan but as he presents an educated case in favour of City, they just talk over himThats an interesting point, no media outlet has managed to get a single legal or finance representative to come on and say why city will be found guilty and what the weight of evidence against city is and how they will be found guilty because of that weight of evidence.
SO TRUE. Why is this I wonder?Has anyone noticed that the likes of Talksport and all these other rag/dipper slanted media outlets have not had someone versed in the legal side of football and football finance come onto their platforms and put forward a view why the Premier League will be successful landing all these charges and why a three man panel is the correct forum to adjudicate on industrial strength fraud? I may have missed it but all these outlets do is spin the line that City must be guilty and don’t outline anyway how they will be found to have done wrong.
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,690
They don’t really do irony, do they?Everton …… “we voted for it to impact City not us, that’s not fair, it’s corrupt!”
Joe 90 was a fictional cartoon not a legal expert a bit like jordans fictional intelligenceI suppose RE talksh Mr Jordan has put himself forward as legally competent so he may resist a proper legal / finance expert.
The other reason is that a real expert is likely to agree with Stefan. Where's the reward for confrontation in that?
surely being a scouser would be considered ironic if it wasnt so tragicThey don’t really do irony, do they?
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
This is the level of stupidity that we're up against with some rival fans. "Go back to the drawing board and come up with something that stops Newcastle, and stops Man City, but doesn't hurt the rest of us". FFS.
Scouse wankers.
I hope City take every fucking last one of the fuckers who`ve had anything to do with this witch hunt and bury them in the courts and strip the bastards of every penny they can.
I said legal or finance representative, not deluded moron there's a plethora of thoseThere was er, Nick Harris …………