PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Coatigan said:
I am 100% not uncomfortable with the question. I have said all along, it is valid, it is fair game. Still haven't found his answer, which also interests me. It is a bit cheap, and a bit token 'lip service' imo, but at no point am I arguing against it.

I am also not using her own household to discredit her, or the question. I am simply noting that pointing out a perception of hypocrisy is also fair game. In a world where perception does matter, and where her question itself deals with exactly that. The perception of being in bed with someone with an unpleasant side.

I think you may also be directing some broader frustration at me specifically, which I would say is largely misplaced. There is no need for this to get pissy, and I am happy to leave it here, there are plenty of others you can take this up with. Or at least not let the tone descend any further.
Click to expand...

Fine we can leave things if you want, although I'd just ask if, when you were pointing out how morally bankrupt she is for having a wrongun for a husband, did you at any point consider that a man who sexually assaults women in the workplace probably starts at home and there's every chance she's a victim instead of the co-conspirator you've portrayed her as?

Might be something worth mulling over for the next time the forum wants to discredit a journalist for asking an obviously fair question.
 
bluenova said:
I like Kieran Maguire, but Football Insider has become one of the most click-bait sites around. Pretty sure when it started, it had lofty ideals, but it's gone lowest common denominator really quickly.

That £500m include wages, agent fees and transfers, so we're probably not far off that most years anyway.
Click to expand...
Not bothered about that. Any shallow victory will do for me.
 
domalino said:
Fine we can leave things if you want, although I'd just ask if, when you were pointing out how morally bankrupt she is for having a wrongun for a husband, did you at any point consider that a man who sexually assaults women in the workplace probably starts at home and there's every chance she's a victim instead of the co-conspirator you've portrayed her as?

Might be something worth mulling over for the next time the forum wants to discredit a journalist for asking an obviously fair question.
Click to expand...

I was doing no such thing.

I was commenting on a take, of perception of hypocrisy.

Not that she isn’t credible. Not that her question isn't valid. Not that she has no right to ask it, or enough credit to ask it. Not any other speculation you have just conjured.

You can't argue the perception. You can argue whether it is relevant. And how that compares to the relevance of the perception her own question is implying.

Once again, it feels like you are bracketing multiple posts by a number here, into something you think I am saying. I don't think I could be any clearer myself, but hopefully the above puts it to bed.
 
domalino said:
Again it's just an ad hom attack on the person asking a valid question because you're uncomfortable with the question being asked.

That's why this woman's husband is even being mentioned, and not the possible crimes of the spouses of every other journalist present. This one asked a question you don't like so you attempt to discredit her.

It just comes across as increibly thin skinned and kind of pathetic that 15 year into the takeover so many fns still can't cope with someone asking a question about the Middle East when it's relevant. What are you so scared of?
Click to expand...
Can we get this back on topic ffs?
 
We were mocked when we were shit.
Mocked when the Sheikh took us over.
Mocked when we signed Robin.
Mocked when we posted losses of £197 million.
Criticised for replacing looser Hughes for winner Mancini.
Criticised for signing Yaya & Silva....not good enough/too small.
Were everyones second team after the Yaya semi and Aguero 93.20.
And then the penny dropped, the plan was unfolding.
A threat,a challenge, an unwelcome, unwanted long term competitor.
Discredit, demolish, destroy.
The end game is now approaching........BUT NOT FOR US !!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.