PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Big stadium at London prices.
Reasonable responses not welcome. They must be doing something dodgy. Is that not how this works? -:)

Seriously tho, regardless of match day income, how they have managed to land some huge commercial deals with no on field return is a question that needs answered but hey they don’t win anything so no one cares.
 
Not that it'll help when discussing with the mouth breathers, but let's just get all factual for a minute. Below are the net spend tables, last 5 seasons, and then since Pep came in, and then the last 10 seasons (20 transfer windows). All from transfermkt, so assuming the underlying data is broadly accurate.
In the last 5 seasons, we are 7th for net spend, FACT (going all Benetiz now).

"but you hide the true fees". Nonsense, buyer and seller agree the fee, City can't pretend it was different.
"But Pep spent millions on full backs when he arrived." Maybe, but based on net spend since he arrived, we are 3rd, and only €5.5 millon above Arsenal in 4th, or about 0.7%, neglibible.
"But you'd been spending wildly for years before that, allowing you to build up the squad". So go back 20 transfer windows, all players who were bought so long ago are well out of the system and irrelvant. We are second behind United, but only about 0.5% above Arsenal and 10% above Chelsea, negligible differences over a decade. And all back before we added another 7 PL titles, and tons of other trophies, so we were needing to over-pay to attract players back then.
"City have unlimited wealth, and have vastly outspent everybody else". That's simply not true (as if they'll care about the truth). United, Chelsea and Arsenal have spent more or similar, by any realistic test or timeframe. They just spent badly. At United, expensive world class players arrive to just disintegrate into a mess, At City, very good players become superstars.

These are the un-reported, un-mentionned, covered-up, actual facts. They don't suit the narrative, so you won't read them elsewhere to any great extent.
"But your wages are huge", well maybe but not massively greater than the rest of the top 5 (ex spurs). But guess what? If you win loads of things, your players will get bonuses. The others should actaully be more concerned with what they are paying players for losing...


Last 5 Seasons, 10 transfer windows.

#
Club
1​
Chelsea FC
€1.51bn
129
€712.26m
133
€-796.09m
2​
Manchester United
€908.18m
85
€213.77m
86
€-694.41m
3​
Arsenal FC
€835.54m
85
€197.20m
89
€-638.34m
4​
Tottenham Hotspur
€808.90m
83
€271.87m
80
€-537.03m
5​
Newcastle United
€580.20m
67
€94.57m
64
€-485.63m
6​
Aston Villa
€602.29m
95
€219.32m
92
€-382.97m
7​
Manchester City
€896.72m
120
€516.77m
121
€-379.95m
8​
West Ham United
€580.16m
60
€297.29m
67
€-282.87m
9​
Liverpool FC
€498.75m
69
€236.15m
68
€-262.60m
10​
Nottingham Forest
€355.73m
143
€122.20m
148
€-233.54m


Pep’s Seasons

#
Club
1​
Manchester United
€1.37bn
115
€337.07m
119
€-1,037.21m
2​
Chelsea FC
€2.11bn
226
€1.10bn
225
€-1,011.44m
3​
Manchester City
€1.51bn
201
€701.07m
200
€-807.99m
4​
Arsenal FC
€1.18bn
123
€379.05m
129
€-802.49m
5​
Tottenham Hotspur
€1.01bn
110
€433.32m
104
€-580.08m
6​
Newcastle United
€750.70m
140
€267.72m
142
€-482.98m
7​
Aston Villa
€709.69m
160
€299.10m
161
€-410.59m
8​
West Ham United
€821.36m
115
€416.08m
120
€-405.29m
9​
Liverpool FC
€934.50m
121
€547.35m
123
€-387.15m
10​
Wolverhampton Wanderers
€680.46m
232
€399.78m
238
€-280.68m


Last 10 seasons, 20 transfer windows.

#
Club
1​
Manchester United
€1.73bn
161
€484.44m
165
€-1,241.19m
2​
Manchester City
€1.82bn
237
€798.80m
241
€-1,021.52m
3​
Chelsea FC
€2.34bn
307
€1.33bn
310
€-1,015.34m
4​
Arsenal FC
€1.33bn
156
€409.35m
163
€-917.67m
5​
Newcastle United
€903.63m
189
€297.02m
190
€-606.61m
6​
Tottenham Hotspur
€1.13bn
141
€564.72m
149
€-568.16m
7​
Liverpool FC
€1.21bn
170
€737.17m
168
€-475.26m
8​
West Ham United
€909.21m
165
€438.99m
172
€-470.22m
9​
Aston Villa
€789.69m
218
€365.12m
225
€-424.58m
10​
Crystal Palace
€459.04m
169
€142.65m
179
€-316.39m

Just a point on transfermarkt.

It separates out some academy players, often with little logic, so Man City U21s have a £90m transfer profit in the last two seasons alone, which wouldn't show up in that list above.

Including players who have nothing much to do with the first team is one reason why net spend is a pointless comparison between Pep and others, but it does make a difference to the overall club finances.
 


Anybody with more knowledge about the case who can have a look at this and see if he makes any valid points or is it just the usual anti city bullshit
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.