PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

You may well be right, we will have to wait and see.

But the PL rules do finally allow for arbitration. I have attached the relevant rules concerning the process, its place in law, the acceptable reasons for arbitration, and the selection of the arbitrators below. So there is recourse, in the circumstances set out below, for arbitration with arbitrators not associated with the PL. But, our legal guys on here say that there is next to no chance the club will go to arbitration claiming that, for example, the independent commission and the appeals board hadn't applied their minds properly to the facts of the case.

I am fully prepared to be blasted again, but I would imagine, as part of the preparation for the independent commission, there are some expensive lawyers considering right now on what grounds the club can appeal first to an appeals board and then to a really independent arbitration panel.

My loins are girded.

View attachment 105846
One can assume then that we already have x4.5 in mind given our irrefutable evidence?
 
One can assume then that we already have x4.5 in mind given our irrefutable evidence?

That would be one hell of an allegation to make against KCs and other professionals even if they are all effectively appointed by the PL, but the ability (no matter how small) to take the process to a really independent arbitration may provide some comfort to those who think we may get stitched up by working to keep the minds of the "independent" commission and the appeals board, should it get to that stage, focused.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.