PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[halfcenturyup]

I’d be surprised if they could make such changes have retrospective effect? Can they?

No chance, I would have thought.

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

I’d be surprised if they could make such changes have retrospective effect? Can they?

We’re dealing with cnuts whose aim is to ruin us any which way they can. Be surprised at nothing

 

[BlueRockape]

Cracking read this, they even managed to shoe horn the Crass of 92 in. Ticks every box.....

Man City ‘expulsion’: Steps to secure Prem return include replacing Guardiola, copying Wrexham

With a 'expulsion' looming (or perhaps not), here are five steps Manchester City *could* make en route to their Premier League return...

www.football365.com

View attachment 111733

Was this written by a two year old fukin dipper

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

Have we been given a date yet? I try to avoid the sensationalism by the media. (& the up and downism on here) ;-)
So I’m in ignorance. :-)

Last update from Tolmie was that we should know the date of the hearing by June.

Projectriver put a timeline up ages ago and my take on where it might be now is:

Hearing date announced in June

Hearing in early autumn

Judgement released around this time next year

Appeals by either party to be concluded by the end of 2025

 

[KS55]

Oh that’s fine then. The FA or whoever will probably be gone by then and it won’t matter. *cheeky grin*

The FA are still considering their response to the Burns Report.

 

[Protein Junkie]

Nigel Clough *could* replace Pep Guardiola?

Football 365 have actually managed to outdo themselves with that pearler. :-)

They're not even hiding the fact they're a desperate clickbait outfit taking the piss. The sad thing is that people are actually buying it too!

A fool/s and his money are easily parted.

 

[meltonblue]

I'm probably missing the point, but doesn't 'fair market value' apply to sponsorships, not manager/player remuneration?

Yes. I meant that more as in the renumeration. If we were paying Mancini an acceptable amount at the time just from us, then unless we were also paying Al Jaziras wage to him too, I’d argue there’s nothing wrong with it, it’s got sod all to do with the PL.

 

[citizen_maine]

Yes. I meant that more as in the renumeration. If we were paying Mancini an acceptable amount at the time just from us, then unless we were also paying Al Jaziras wage to him too, I’d argue there’s nothing wrong with it, it’s got sod all to do with the PL.

What rules define 'acceptable' remuneration though?

 

[Rochdale Blue]

I don't think there is a smoking gun anywhere in these allegations, or a gun of any kind. Not even a water pistol.

There might be water pistols full of boiling piss when the red top loonies read the judgement.

 

[Ballymagash Blue]

There might be water pistols full of boiling piss when the red top loonies read the judgement.

I wish that had occurred to me when we were kids.