citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 12,359
The questions he should be asking is why does anybody need to be stopped and from what?The fact he openly says “it doesn’t stop anybody” is all I need to hear, the bent cunts.
The questions he should be asking is why does anybody need to be stopped and from what?The fact he openly says “it doesn’t stop anybody” is all I need to hear, the bent cunts.
Wouldn’t the SFO only become involved if the PL handed them evidence of Serious wrongdoing at this stage? Plus, would the PL would be obliged to hand over any evidence or not?Let me summarise for anyone still trying to get their head around whether the club has been accused of fraud and, if so, why the authorities aren't banging the club's back doors in. Literally and figuratively.
Firstly, this is a breach of contract case. The allegations are that the club breached its contract with the PL. Which is why the referral to the panel doesn't mention the word "fraud", only the alleged breaches of the rules that form part of the contract. It's not a criminal case, no-one is going to jail following the panel's decision.
But, the combination of allegations (presenting errors in the accounts, disguising equity injections, acting in bad faith, failing FFP) do effectively represent fraudulent activity if proven, and the civil sanctions can be punitive. City's lawyers made this point at CAS, CAS agreed and you can be sure the club's lawyers will be doing the same in front of the panel. Why? Because it raises the cogency of the evidence required to prove the allegations. It is generally accepted on here that there is little chance the PL have the evidence to prove their most serious allegations. The higher cogency makes it almost impossible, imho.
So, if the allegations effectively represent fraudulent activity, why aren't the authorities at the Etihad now? Well, there is no definitive answer because no two situations are the same, but let me ask you this. If you were head of the SFO, you had seen UEFA's charges and how they were dismissed, you had followed the PL's allegations, but have no knowledge of the PL's evidence, other than the fact it should most probably be based on the same as UEFA's evidence, what would you do? Go into the PL and the Etihad all guns blazing with your limited resources to get to the bottom of it? Or wait until the panel comes to a conclusion and then decide what to do? I think that is an easy decision, tbh, especially given the way CAS dealt with UEFA's charges.
All imho, of course, and open to being bashed by the lawyers on here.
The questions he should be asking is why does anybody need to be stopped and from what?
Nope. That comes straight from Mansour’s secret “got away with it” account.Does this include bonuses ?
Wouldn’t the SFO only become involved if the PL handed them evidence of Serious wrongdoing at this stage? Plus, would the PL would be obliged to hand over any evidence or not?
You've not considered a word I've said. I've stepped away from the semantics long ago, so I could gain a better global overview.Hard to understand your point(s). You are fixated on irrelevant semantics and the absence of public statements. As I said earlier, read the FAQ.
I think the sticking point maybe the PL (& UEFA before them) wanting access to ADUG, Etisalat & Etihad's internal accounts & bank statements to prove our liability.If we’ve provided irrefutable evidence how can we have not co-operated?
Got to be honest, the sight of you patiently batting off some internet bloviator whose legal vocabulary includes "Red Top Mafia" and "Spuds" had made me smile today.Hard to understand your point(s). You are fixated on irrelevant semantics and the absence of public statements. As I said earlier, read the FAQ.
Seeing as it’s us and the rags with stand out bigger turnover and revenue , my money is on the jumped up shits that spurs are , such an over inflated image of themselves , the biggest fucking myth in English football.Underneath his analysis on twitter someone asks if it's the smaller clubs/PL trying to reign in the big six.
He actually says this is only going to affect "one or two of the big six", and says that it's being driven by "one of the big six". Given who voted, it's either Liverpool, Arsenal, or Spurs. Which isn't much of a surprise.