Spurs vs City post match

i do agree that our midfield was part of the reason why we lost, but Gundogan didnt even play the first half! i think we improved a bit when he came on just before the hour mark.

I should've written anonymous instead of appalling would've made more sense then! :)
 
You think you're the new Guardiola? But you're trying to dissect the team too much. We simply got bullied off the ball today - nothing more - nothing less. Our defense wasn't shit (as you kept telling us it was), none of the goals could be put down to our incompetent players. It was nothing to do with that at all. Watch the game, digest and read it. We lost today because we were slow to pick up the second ball, and got bullied off the ball too easily. That is all it amounts to. Guardiola saw what was happening, and changed it (albeit too little too late), and the game changed. It 's not the end of the world though, we are going to lose the odd game - get used to it. I'd hate to watch a match with you - most of my City mates would run you out of town, for being a bandwagon jumper, or having no idea where we've come from. Start supporting your team for Gods sake!

I don't agree that it was entirely a matter of "simply getting bullied off the ball" I did digest and read the game and have reached the conclusion that over the course of the 90 minutes we were very much second best. Of course we have to accept that we will lose games but I felt that it was just a little bit to easy for Spurs yesterday to take the points as we lacked a cohesive response to their high press and even allowing for the misuse of Fernando I think we are starting to struggle with this aspect of the game. Too many players having to run backward to receive balls and a rather disjointed approach to transformation from defence to attack. This was not our strongest 11 Nolito on the left and Kev were badly missed but the reversion to some of the poor decision making of last season by Kolorov and Otto is very worrying. When the pressure largely missing over the first month has been applied a number of players are starting to make poor decisions and the passing which was crisp and accurate has deteriorated in quality.
We have now lost the last 3 games against Spurs and despite some bad luck and poor decisions in all honesty we have played second fiddle to them. They demonstrated that they are a good team yesterday and we will need to improve on our play if we are to finish above them. However, we are still capable of getting the better of them and I fully subscribe to those who believe that it will take time for Pep to perfect his system and assemble more players who are suited to his style. He is as is often alluded to the King of press resistance and finding solutions to problems which crop up on an ongoing basis. We now have a chance to clear our heads and the fixture list in the league over the next few weeks is tricky but not too difficult. If we keep our composure and collect some points we will stay in contention until the critical Christmas period when we must face Arsenal, Liverpool and Spurs again in relatively quick succession. How we deal with these dangerous opponents is likely to go a long way towards determining our finishing position. We must hope that Pep can fashion
an adequate response to the questions posed yesterday which we had difficulty answering.
 
Thought the game highlighted a lack of balance in the squad:

Sterling / Navas / Sane fighting it out for 1 position on right-wing
The moment we lose Nolito - our lack of options for left wing ends up with Sterling / Navas looking less effective there
Gabriel Jesus will partially address this when he arrives, but given difference in team ethic + tactics since MP left, I would have preferred Pep to ask Nasri to stay + assess what he can do.
If other players have improved under Pep - why not Nasri who can play both left + more centrally with level of ball retention that Pep Loves.

Surprised Sagna + Clichy didn't start.
Is Pep really saying that Zabaleta + AK are our first choice full-backs in a difficult away game?
I don't particularly like Walker at RB for Spurs but I thought his aggression from the first whistle set a tempo / benchmark for Spurs that we struggled to match.
 
We lost a game FFS, its football, these things happen.
+1

No side wins every single game they play.

But against Spurs, we've faced 3 consecutive sides that will press us - and we've performed below expectation in every single one of those fixtures (Swansea, Celtic, and Spurs).

We're not at full strength, not by a long shot.

It's not at all surprising for me that we lost against an excellent Spurs side.

KDB, Kompany - out

Sane, Gundogan - coming off injuries, not fit to play for a full 90.

Nolito suspended.

Playing, arguably, the 2nd best side in the EPL on their home pitch.

We were screwed before the opening kickoff - the only thing that really surprised me was the inclusion of Fernando (great stamina, seems loyal to our side, but absolutely lacks any sort of passing ability whatsoever, and who - for that reason - will be sold as soon as possible) over Garcia. For me, Garcia deserved a chance to start as our pivot. That said, Pep is not a complete fucking tactical idiot as was Pellers - nor is he much above average as was Mancini - Pep is the best fucking tactical/strategic genius in all of world football.

I'd have absolutely started Garcia as the 6 over Fernando, and possibly Sagna instead of Zaba on the right.

But with KDB out, and, apparently, Gundogan not fit to go for a full 90, we were fucked from the get-go; team depth needs to improve to fix this. Again, Pep hasn't been here nearly long enoug to address this.
====================
I'm not disappointed in the loss overly much - it may end up costing us the title since we dropped 3 points against one of our most serious rivals - but I don't think we could have done much better given our current squad.

Sane and Gundogan both available for a full 90 will immediately improve our side; Noito not on suspension will also help; Jesus coming in as well - we're going to be much more formidable very soon.
 
After a sleep it's a little easier to analyse.

Like many have said the team sheet looked wrong from the start. Zab and kolarov were pretty dire in mid week and shouldn't have been anywhere near the team today.

Unfortunately they were and we did resort to type. Yesterday we needed to flood the midfield with quick, short passes making their press run around for minutes on end for little reward. Kolarov and Zabs needed to come in field and let navas and sterling stay out wide.

I really hope it's not the case but I can't help but feel that pep threw this game or at least positioned it to more than likely end in a loss. That might sound mad but in some lines of work you want to fail fast, knowing that it's coming anyway, so that you can learn from failing before too many habits bed in.

We were always going to end the weekend on top of the table and that's the most important part. If pep can spend the week with the boys, using the hurt from the weekend to inspire and motivate them then there's no reason we can't go another run of unbeaten games - as long as red cards and injuries give us the squad we need.

Have to say, that yesterday was the least disappointed I have been after a defeat. Not because we played well and were unlucky but more it showed exactly which players are the square pegs in this side. We are definitely a midfielder short, unless we can clone Fernandinho, Zabaleta is done, Kolarov's renaissance could be short lived if he can't show a little more composure and Otamendi needs to stay on his feet.

I doubt Pep would throw any match more that he was a little handcuffed in team selection in midfield. Gundogan isn't fully fit, KdB is injured and Nolito was suspended. I can't fathom why he started Zabaleta though.

Spurs were very good, everyone played very well and they all looked very comfortable in their system. They also despite being far better than us for the entire first half got a little lucky with Kolarov's own goal and the mess he made with ball at his feet for their second.

I also thought Fernandinho was fouled in the build up to their first and that Kun should've had a penalty. Marriner let the game flow but could easily have dismissed Otamendi and Rose. I thought he allowed Spurs bully us, time and again Spurs players got away with niggly fouls in that the likes of Silva, Kun and Navas were nudged and kicked but kept the ball but it did enought to interrupt our flow. But it worked for Spurs so fair play to them.

I expect we'll see a lot of stories that Spurs and Celtic have shown how to beat City and that we should stop playing it from the back. I am sure we're on the right path though, at one point first half Fernandinho took the ball on the half turn from Bravo and 6 Spurs players were out of the game. That's the way we're going to play so we'd better buckle up and enjoy.
 
The fundamental problem is that, apart from Stones, the defenders aren't really good enough to play consistently well in Pep's system. Neither is Fernando as the pivot. Pep has extracted some very good performances from them and will continue to do so. But no more than 7 times out of 10.

Perhaps the times they don't perform up to standard will be against the better sides?
 
I think we are pretty decent as far as centre halves go - Otamendi is decent, as is Stones, and hopefully Kompany will have a run at some point. But when you have Kolarov preening and standing around like a bookend and Zabba frankly all over the place, we were effectively playing with a back 2.

Unfortunately, barring transfers, I don't know how Pep is going to fix this. One immediate change he can make, is to play Clichy and Sagna, ALWAYS.

Not an option, I'm afraid. Not when you're playing a game every three to four days, as we have been doing, and will be doing pretty much right through the season. They would be completely burned out half way through. Best case scenario (and it's not ideal) is to play the lads, Maffeo and Angelino for all league cup matches, and maybe some of the easier (?) league matches at home, alternating them with Zab and Kolarov for those last ones. Otherwise, all of the league matches, barring the easiest ones, plus all Champions League matches without exception: Sagna and Clichy. But even Sagna and Clichy aren't ideal, not in the long term, or even in the medium term. They're not young men, as atheletes go. Pep must be looking regularly at the lads and weighing up whether they'll make the grade as long-term options – and otherwise keeping a close eye on what's available in Europe/Latin America. In central defence Stones will be with us for years, Otamendi's still got a role to play (although he was back to his Keystone Cops stuff of last season yesterday, it seemed to me). I'm no longer even thinking of Vinny any longer, tragic as it is to admit. A fully fit Vinny, paired with Stones, and Bravo behind them, playing match after match? I honestly think we'd walk the league, whoever the fullbacks were. Sadly, it isn't going to happen.
That leaves Tosin, but he's not ready to step in on a regular basis, not for a season, maybe even two. It all looks a bit thin, to me, frankly.
 
I don't agree that it was entirely a matter of "simply getting bullied off the ball" I did digest and read the game and have reached the conclusion that over the course of the 90 minutes we were very much second best. Of course we have to accept that we will lose games but I felt that it was just a little bit to easy for Spurs yesterday to take the points as we lacked a cohesive response to their high press and even allowing for the misuse of Fernando I think we are starting to struggle with this aspect of the game. Too many players having to run backward to receive balls and a rather disjointed approach to transformation from defence to attack. This was not our strongest 11 Nolito on the left and Kev were badly missed but the reversion to some of the poor decision making of last season by Kolorov and Otto is very worrying. When the pressure largely missing over the first month has been applied a number of players are starting to make poor decisions and the passing which was crisp and accurate has deteriorated in quality.
We have now lost the last 3 games against Spurs and despite some bad luck and poor decisions in all honesty we have played second fiddle to them. They demonstrated that they are a good team yesterday and we will need to improve on our play if we are to finish above them. However, we are still capable of getting the better of them and I fully subscribe to those who believe that it will take time for Pep to perfect his system and assemble more players who are suited to his style. He is as is often alluded to the King of press resistance and finding solutions to problems which crop up on an ongoing basis. We now have a chance to clear our heads and the fixture list in the league over the next few weeks is tricky but not too difficult. If we keep our composure and collect some points we will stay in contention until the critical Christmas period when we must face Arsenal, Liverpool and Spurs again in relatively quick succession. How we deal with these dangerous opponents is likely to go a long way towards determining our finishing position. We must hope that Pep can fashion
an adequate response to the questions posed yesterday which we had difficulty answering.

The problems started at the back. The way we play, if the ball isn't coming out smoothly from defence(and the pivot) then the likes of Silva will always struggle to get into the game. I think De Bruyne would also have struggled to get into the game yesterday, although he might have provided a game changing flash of brilliance.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.