The British Monarchy | Princess of Wales diagnosed with cancer (p396)

I think there is a very real implication of effect on public trust (which is really the only real power the RF have now). These sort of bizarre, increasingly poorly handled situations—in this case involving the next Queen Consort, King of England, and his heirs (perhaps very soon due to HM’s own serious health issues)—undermine what value the RF actually provide at this point, and create unnecessary tensions during an already tense time. It is an even more shambolic (though, hopefully far less impactful) version of the RF/RH early undertakings with Diana.

And that is coming from someone that would end the monarchy tomorrow if I had the power. And we could then all agree this is no more or less important than anyone else going through the same events.

Public trust in what, did the public vote for them, am I missing something? People regularly argue that they are nothing more than entertainment, a private family there for show and amusement of the country. Can't then have it both ways then, demanding public trust and explanations for everything going on, but trivialising it generally. Or wanting them cancelled like a netflix show because you don't like an episode or have had to wait for a new one.

I don't get how anyone can have an overarching stance like your last line (which I kind of agree with), and then treat a story really just created by the public and wild speculation, like it something bigger and highly significant to the general punter.
 
Public trust in what, did the public vote for them, am I missing something? People regularly argue that they are nothing more than entertainment, a private family there for show and amusement of the country. Can't then have it both ways then, demanding public trust and explanations for everything going on, but trivialising it generally. Or wanting them cancelled like a netflix show because you don't like an episode or have had to wait for a new one.

I don't get how anyone can have an overarching stance like your last line (which I kind of agree with), and then treat a story really just created by the public and wild speculation, like it something bigger and highly significant to the general punter.
I’d say that as a ‘brand’ the Royal family represent continuity and stability to the nation. (At large, not of course to every single individual).

In fact, cultural artifact is probably a better way to describe it. It has existed and upheld so many formal traditions for so long that it’s a comforting reminder that we also continue to exist as a nation with a common identity/unity.
(Plenty of discussion to be had about the impact of diversity on the national unity/psyche for those who want it, I’m sure).

The pomp and circumstance around the Queen’s death showed this principle off - the immediate announcements heralding the new King around the country, starting at St James’s Palace being the setting of the narrative that was required for hundred of years to prevent usurpers from filling the vacuum with their own narrative which, without opposition, could easily become accepted fact.

The extant Monarch is always the particular flavoured product of their era. The institution of the Monarchy itself is the brand - the bridge between monarchs which with all its procedures, represented and managed that stability and continuity that puts peoples’ minds at ease in times of such change, erasing doubt so they can continue about their nation building ways without much disruption.

That’s why this kind of narrative limbois very bad for the longevity of the institution itself as we are beginning see.
It’s a growing vacuum open to be filled with rumour and doubt as to the Monarchy’s ability even to manage itself any more…
 
Public trust in what, did the public vote for them, am I missing something? People regularly argue that they are nothing more than entertainment, a private family there for show and amusement of the country. Can't then have it both ways then, demanding public trust and explanations for everything going on, but trivialising it generally. Or wanting them cancelled like a netflix show because you don't like an episode or have had to wait for a new one.

I don't get how anyone can have an overarching stance like your last line (which I kind of agree with), and then treat a story really just created by the public and wild speculation, like it something bigger and highly significant to the general punter.
I have spoken to the nature of the public trust that the RF is meant to maintain (or degrade) elsewhere in the thread, so I will refrain from repeating that treatise. @Plays By Sense Of Smell does an exceptional job speaking to it in his reply to your question.

I will say, I do not wish to “cancel” the monarchy because I do not like this “episode”. As I said in another post, for me, this is simply another in an infinitely long list of examples as to why the monarchy should be absolished.

Ultimately, either the RF (and their decisions and actions) matter or they don’t.

If they don’t matter, then their only function is to hoard and leech resources from the nation that could be better used to help many that are struggling to stay afloat right now.

If they do matter, then this bizarre, increasingly shambolic situation is important in the context of their function, which is primarily maintaining public trust in the governance and stability of the nation (which is especially relevant right now).

As you say, one cannot have it both ways, in which the RF matter but this situation does not.
 
Isn't that just Pippa in the car not Kate ?
Both pippa and Kate are very slender. Whoever that is they have extreme swelling to their face. Steroid side effects maybe ? Swelling from facial reconstruction after a broken jaw/heavy beating to the head ? It's a fucking weird photo
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.