The Times: Utd and Liverpool vetted new PL CEO candidates

bakerdave76

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,434
9f5e1541ef3c2c3f76ef71d13cfdebb3.jpg
 
The bit that's visible free says they met the three who didn't take it (some after accepting it), but no details on why. I wonder what the main article says.
 
The bit that's visible free says they met the three who didn't take it (some after accepting it), but no details on why. I wonder what the main article says.
There is something stinking up at the top,refusing it and the others who accepted then bailed out,i hope the corruption in this country comes out in my lifetime,i'm gagging to see it
 
There is something stinking up at the top,refusing it and the others who accepted then bailed out,i hope the corruption in this country comes out in my lifetime,i'm gagging to see it

Yes, having one accept and change their mind is careless, having two or three does suggest that there's something 'interesting'.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.