"There is a lot of evidence decisions go in Uniteds favour"

RadcliffeRick said:
Blue Haze said:
He has the balls to say what everyone is thinking.

Good man.

When rednose and Wenger retire, those will be great days for the league.

I agree that he has got the balls to stand up and say what is happening but I fear that by the time the red biased press had had it's day this conference will be presented as a "Rafa type" rant. The more I watch Rafa's conference, and the events that have followed it, the more truth there is to it. Sadly it will alway be seen as a rant of a bitter man thanks to the press.

I agree with this. It's time that Mancini, Martinez, AVB all go out and support each other like Fergies cronies do. We should spend 10m on broadcasting it, be the best signing ever!
 
This should get interesting.
SAF will probably point to decisions not going his way in 10 years using the Drogba offside goal as proof. Of course he wont mention that they also scored a hand ball goal in the same game that ended 2-1 and thus 2 wrong calls cancelled each other out. And the two extremely soft penalties they got from Howard Webb in the 3-3 draw last year.
He will also say that they lost the title last year because newcastle got a soft penalty while not mentioning the two dives in consecutive matches that Ashley Young won.

He will also get Sam Allardyce, Pulis and David Moyes to stand up in his favor and say that there is no bias. Its all a foreigner agenda against Fergie.
 
I'm enjoying Chelsea are United having a go at one another. Let the kids bicker while the adults win the league.
 
bleed.blue said:
This should get interesting.
SAF will probably point to decisions not going his way in 10 years using the Drogba offside goal as proof. Of course he wont mention that they also scored a hand ball goal in the same game that ended 2-1 and thus 2 wrong calls cancelled each other out. And the two extremely soft penalties they got from Howard Webb in the 3-3 draw last year.
He will also say that they lost the title last year because newcastle got a soft penalty while not mentioning the two dives in consecutive matches that Ashley Young won.

Don't forget the pen that Fulham didn't win in a crucial game near the end of last season. And the Rooney elbow the season before (<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/9409644.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 409644.stm</a>), and no ban for this: <a class="postlink" href="http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/apr/04/wayne-rooney-premier-league-swearing?cat=football&type=article" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/a ... pe=article</a>, and this one: <a class="postlink" href="http://boards.dailymail.co.uk/sport/9972358-exclusive-rooney-escape-extra-ban-despite-raging-ref-punching-corner-flag-uniteds-defeat-fulham-3.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://boards.dailymail.co.uk/sport/997 ... ham-3.html</a>, and the Vidic elbow, and the Evans assaults, and the 4-3 derby injury time, and the EXTREMELY soft pen that won them the title at Ewood park in 2011, and most of their games against Liverpool, and the Frontzeck red, and the Bruce header against Sheffield Weds, and the Henning Berg incident in the early 90s, and the Derby County game in the early 90s (<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/121524/Leave-refs-alone.html?print=yes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... ?print=yes</a>), and the countless times Scholes should have walked, and the extra injury time they get when they need it (<a class="postlink" href="http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/sep/22/manchester-united-goals-stoppage-time?cat=football&type=article" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/s ... pe=article</a>), and the Welbeck penalty, and the Nani farce vs Spurs, and the Ronaldo kick vs Blackburn when SWP was sent off for the same offence, and every bit of Rafa's rant, and their recent games vs Chelsea, and when Ferguson kidnapped Berbatov without permission, and when he got a lift to a game from a high ranking UEFA official, and when Rooney did all this against Aalborg: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.theoffside.com/tournaments/champions-league/wayne-rooney-still-has-a-temper.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theoffside.com/tournaments/c ... emper.html</a>, which he was of course let off for: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/443978-ferguson-condemns-rooney-treatment" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/4 ... -treatment</a> and when Dowd didn't send off Vidic in the 2009 Carling Cup final for a last man foul after 5 mins - I could go on and on all day, all this is just the tip of the iceberg.

But there's no agenda of course...
 
Ric said:
lita69 said:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/nov/02/roberto-di-matteo-alex-ferguson

Roberto Di Matteo has suggested that Sir Alex Ferguson should keep his views to himself over the Mark Clattenburg controversy while he added to the sense of friction between the pair by claiming that referees' decisions in the big games went in "one direction" in favour of Manchester United.

The Chelsea manager struggled to conceal his frustration at Ferguson's comments from earlier in the day, when his United counterpart had effectively questioned the veracity of the London club's allegation against Clattenburg. Chelsea accused the referee of racially abusing the midfielder Mikel John Obi in last Sunday's Premier League defeat by United at Stamford Bridge, and Ferguson said he could not believe that Clattenburg would have done so.

Di Matteo made it clear that he was unimpressed at Ferguson talking about a club other than his own, as he followed the Chelsea policy of not offering an opinion on the matter while Football Association and police investigations were continuing, and he agreed, when it was put to him, that Ferguson's remarks had been unhelpful. "Yes, and I have to say that it happened in the past as well," he said. "There is a lot of respect between your colleagues, the managers, in general. And everybody has a different approach. Some people talk about other clubs and clubs' issues and some don't. We'll take the knowledge of his comments but it doesn't mean that we share it.

"It's a free country where everybody has freedom of speech. We take into consideration what other people say and use it as a motivational tool for ourselves. It is a free country, as I say, and everybody can say what they want. He [Ferguson] likes to talk about other clubs; we tend not to. I'll leave it up to him."

Di Matteo and members of his Chelsea backroom staff clashed with Ferguson on the touchline during last Sunday's game, following Fernando Torres's second yellow card, for a dive, and again at full-time. Ferguson later said that Torres, the Chelsea striker, had no one to blame but himself after he "chose to go down". Di Matteo has maintained that Clattenburg's decision to send off Torres was wrong while replays showed that Javier Hernández's winning goal should have been disallowed for offside.

Di Matteo pointedly said he would "leave that up to you to judge", when he was asked whether it was fair for a manager of Ferguson's standing to use his influence via public comments and it seemed as though there was plenty that he might have liked to say. He gave vent, though, on the subject of refereeing decisions and he took a conspiratorial line over the notion that United have been favoured by them this season, notably in their league wins at Liverpool and Chelsea. United beat 10‑man Liverpool with the help of a debatable penalty.

"There is a lot of evidence for being concerned that all the decisions go in United's favour," Di Matteo said. "There are some feelings in general but I don't think they [referees] do that with a purpose. It's just part of their decision-making and it seems to go in one direction. Does it even itself out? I don't know.

"We need to support the referees. The players and managers have to do everything to support the referees. As much as it angers us and me personally when a key decision goes against me, I still believe we need to do everything to support the officials and make sure that they can perform at the best of their ability."

Chelsea are the European champions and Premier League leaders but they are a club under siege; Arsène Wenger, the Arsenal manager, has been another to criticise them for their handling of the Clattenburg affair and how they initially went "public with little proof". Di Matteo, though, claimed that Chelsea had conducted themselves properly. "We believe we did what was right," he said. "We believe we behave correctly. We have an objective in front of us and are going to continue to work for that. If other people have different objectives or opinions, it won't influence us."

Mikel will play at Swansea City on Saturday, with Di Matteo talking up the strength of his character, but David Luiz and Juan Mata have joined Frank Lampard on the injured list. John Terry serves the final match of his suspension, so Branislav Ivanovic will start in central defence.

Some will agree, some won't.

I imagine Pigeonho's frothing at the mouth reading that.

as will all rags.
 
It will all come out when the Govan piss can hangs up his crombie, all the fear of the journalists will be gone and his cronies will be silenced, as one poster put on here weeks ago ther will be celebrations within the swamp as well, football will be in a better place when hes gone
 
[quote="as one poster put on here weeks ago ther will be celebrations within the swamp as well, football will be in a better place when hes gone[/quote]

Not when they have to start handing their cups back
 
blue underpants said:
It will all come out when the Govan piss can hangs up his crombie, all the fear of the journalists will be gone and his cronies will be silenced, as one poster put on here weeks ago ther will be celebrations within the swamp as well, football will be in a better place when hes gone

Someone on the radio said that football would be a better place without him.
He was quickly shouted down and cut off.
Fergie is a master of putting refs under pressure by telling the world how good they are.
Immediately they fear losing their new best friend and hey presto another decision goes their way.
Some Utd fans are becoming embarrassed.
When we get a really bad decision go for us I genuinely worry we'll be on the wrong end of some shockers in the coming weeks, but Fergie just laps it up knowing there will rarely be an injustice against his team.
If there is the ref know's he won't ref the tw@ts again.
 
This site is quite interesting (unless you believe there's a conspiracy that is)

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.debatabledecisions.com/english-premier-league-tables" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.debatabledecisions.com/engli ... gue-tables</a>

Whilst it has shown in the past that the rags aren't as favoured as people claim, I've used it against them as some I know have accused us of getting too many decisions in our favour. An interesting site whichever point of view you have I would imagine.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.