Blueknows
Well-Known Member
I like Samuel says it as it is
I like Samuel says it as it is
There’s the downside even if we beat them on this.I’d rather just be banned now. If the decision gets overturned most city fans won’t be attending champions league games
You realize his legal team is firm of Google, Yahoo and Wikipedia.Let me check your comment with my legal team.
You’re exactly the sort of sad, insecure fuck who deploys that term in order to feel like a big man.
pep now odds on to leave before next season, 1:2, only 33:1 to start next season.
this is the type of negativity this will generate, and it can't not affect the players.
I’d just love us to get the fcukers on the legality of FFP itself. It always was a blatant protection racket (to use Martin Samuel’s apt description) but, until now, no club’s had sufficient motivation or cash to challenge it in court.I don't want us to win on a technicality.
I am just checking with my legal team if that is defamation of character.
Who did it take by surprise ? Posters on here may have said we would not be banned and are now surprised but as the club have said very little and none to my knowledge post on here, we don't know what they thought would happen. I wish people would not believe everything that is posted on BM. The guy that owns us bought us for 200 mill, he sold 11% to the Chinese for 200 mill. This guy knows what he is doing. Lawyers can send letters and that is about it until they stand up in court. We have not been allowed near a court. Please explain why you think the club and its lawyers were taken by surprise.