mexico1970
Well-Known Member
I imagine it will be no more than a couple of hundred if any
When the first flight takes off the sales of blue and purple hair dye will go up exponentially.
I imagine it will be no more than a couple of hundred if any
Oh dear. If we were between Africa and the rest of Europe, yes of course they would be trying to cross to Europe. And I don't think you'd want to stop the boats then.So how many are leaving in overcrowded rubber dinghies from our shores, that’s right nobody.
We are paying millions to the French to stop this illegal form of entry, and typical of that nation they stand around twiddling their fingers.
Their efforts are about as effective as their much vaunted Maginot line was at stopping the German invasion.
Apart from all the unskilled jobs no-one wants to do, and the skilled ones.Well it needs to be a certainty that they are sent to Rwanda, we are full for unskilled migrants
Immigration is a good thing if managed correctly and we are only getting the cream of the crop not the dregs
Will you be there waving an upside down Union Jack?When the first flight takes off the sales of blue and purple hair dye will go up exponentially.
Why would they bypass us if we were between Africa & Europe?Oh dear. If we were between Africa and the rest of Europe, yes of course they would be trying to cross to Europe. And I don't think you'd want to stop the boats then.
Silly tit-for-tat, the question is, are you happy to move a maximum of 300 possible legal asylum seekers to Rwanda at approx £2 mil a time?
If you’re in favour of that, you’re a lunatic and probably have your miserable life planned out.
Check the facts, behave.It's not going to cost 2 million an asylum seeker, behave.
Check the facts, behave.
Them all hopefullyHow many people do you expect Rwanda to accept?