Always need a Negredo/Dzeko/Adebayor for a plan b
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why are we always so poor against Klopp’s Liverpool?
- Thread starter Dipsis_LTU_MC
- Start date
Lot of times we had the ball tonight in second half out left or right Sane, Sterling looking in and we had Silva/Jesus between 4-6 strong, tall Liverpool players.
Of course we hardly were able to make a proper cross but if we do it had not much chance to make a header in there. With a tall 3rd striker that option is valid without it its hard.
Interesting because at Bayern his team scored lots of headers from Robben, Ribery, alaba, Lahm etc. crossing like mad only to Lewandowski, Müller arrive for a great header.
For us Sterling, Kun, Jesus especially vs packed defences like we are up against it 90% of times its hard to score headers in open play unless its a counter with a good cross with only 1 striker vs 1 defender inside. (Jesus vs Everton)
That old Brazilian would be good, Crouchinho.
Of course we hardly were able to make a proper cross but if we do it had not much chance to make a header in there. With a tall 3rd striker that option is valid without it its hard.
Interesting because at Bayern his team scored lots of headers from Robben, Ribery, alaba, Lahm etc. crossing like mad only to Lewandowski, Müller arrive for a great header.
For us Sterling, Kun, Jesus especially vs packed defences like we are up against it 90% of times its hard to score headers in open play unless its a counter with a good cross with only 1 striker vs 1 defender inside. (Jesus vs Everton)
That old Brazilian would be good, Crouchinho.
Because Liverpool work harder and nearly always have 11 players behind the ball. It's not rocket science. Unless you take every chance and the other team has a lackluster attack, the team that plays with 11 men behind the ball almost always win.
Equally matched? What? Henderson, Milner and Ox are as good as silva, KDB and Dinho? Our midfield is miles better than theirs. Modric and Kroos would’ve made them look as shit as they really are.Our teams are equally matched in terms of talent so its has to be motivation, mentality and will to win. We just tend to bottle it at Anfield.
What worries me about Klopp is he might eventually be the f****r that wins these lot the title.
Yea seems that way! Looks like Henderson ox and Milner just levelled up with kdb Silva dinhoEqually matched? What? Henderson, Milner and Ox are as good as silva, KDB and Dinho? Our midfield is miles better than theirs. Modric and Kroos would’ve made them look as shit as they really are.
What worries me about Klopp is he might eventually be the f****r that wins these lot the title.
Tonight
citymad
Well-Known Member
Equally matched? What? Henderson, Milner and Ox are as good as silva, KDB and Dinho? Our midfield is miles better than theirs. Modric and Kroos would’ve made them look as shit as they really are.
What worries me about Klopp is he might eventually be the f****r that wins these lot the title.
Not tonight they weren't. We've struggled before a few times against a pressing team. I would wager that the scum trio would outshine posers like Modric and Kroos up any day.
Goater=Legend
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Apr 2006
- Messages
- 6,459
Love to know a status of how many games at Anfield we've conceded in the first 30 minutes
Because our football is similar to Amir Khan's boxing....
Looks fucking brilliant until the opposition actually decide to throw some punches back.
Some may say Liverpool got the luck last night, but as they saying goes, those that work hard seem to get more of it.
In short it was a poor performance caused by primarily a lack of collective fight.
Looks fucking brilliant until the opposition actually decide to throw some punches back.
Some may say Liverpool got the luck last night, but as they saying goes, those that work hard seem to get more of it.
In short it was a poor performance caused by primarily a lack of collective fight.