Bill
Well-Known Member
No thanks.If Sanchez does sign and Mbappe is possible , maybe Sterling would be sacrificed.
No thanks.If Sanchez does sign and Mbappe is possible , maybe Sterling would be sacrificed.
No thanks.
We need top top English players. Sterling is right up there.Keep Sterling and loose Mbappe?
Not for me, Mbappe is the real deal, crazy money, but to me in a few years time we would look back and think it was reasonable.
We need top top English players. Sterling is right up there.
And the English quota?We need the best players, if English a bonus
Beat me to it, the keeper thread next me thinks.I wonder how many different threads we can have which manage to shoehorn getting rid of Sterling into them?
It's pretty impressive tbh.
Think he's still got a way to go to be as good as we'd like, but after an indifferent first season, he was, in the main, much improved last season. If he carries on with the improvements he will be an excellent player for us. Just needs the confidence to take on players and fail, but try again next time, like Sanè does.We need top top English players. Sterling is right up there.
Silva's x2 and KDBMbappe,Aguero,Sanchez,sane,stering,jesus.
I cannot fathom how we can accommodate such a transfer without selling Aguero first. Even if it's one of Sanchez/Mbappe instead of both, it's still difficult to comprehend where Mbappe would fit in if Aguero remains for at least another season.
Aguero is too young and too good to be slumming it in the Argentinian league - he will only be 30 next summer.If it was just one of them, Mbappe will play sometimes in Henry's Barca position.
If it was both what if we sold Aguero second ?
Like next year, so he goes to Argentina after the World Cup, as he initially said he wanted to ?