Samir Nasri

[Blue Coop]

Send him home then. Easy.

 

[MeatHunterrr]

If its true then he needs to be loaned or sold as soon as possible. Pep took him to tour to make up the numbers as B. Silva is not available yet.

 

[not my fault!]

If its true then he needs to be loaned or sold as soon as possible.

Maybe that's his plan, disrupt pre season so we'll sell him to Roma on the cheap. Maybe that's why the links have gone quiet?

 

[lee_wsm]

Maybe that's his plan, disrupt pre season so we'll sell him to Roma on the cheap. Maybe that's why the links have gone quiet?

Or pay him off and cancel contract

 

[sir baconface]

I don't like tittle-tattle and believe everyone deserves a fair hearing.

Fcuk off Nasri.

 

[MeatHunterrr]

Or pay him off and cancel contract

If he is on £150k, thats around £7,5m per year. would cost £15m to pay him off. Would be cheaper to loan him.

 

[birchwoodgingerste]

Or pay him off and cancel contract

Don't sell him let him rot Cnut!

 

[Mr HJ]

If he is on £150k, thats around £7,5m per year. would cost £15m to pay him off. Would be cheaper to loan him.

He's on 120k per week which is a big sticking point when it comes to sales to Italian teams. Should insist on loan to NYC he'd love it there with his fancy Dan ways.

 

[almir]

Nasri is surely not one of the greatest and modest characters but I'm bit suspicious about this coming in different papers at same time. This sounds bit like transfer price killing game. Doubt anyone from City would send this info to papers knowing we're probably more than happy to sell him, it just kills our leverage and pushes the price down. Might be someone from his camp though.

 

[pavelsrnicek]

Looks like a briefing. The only reason I could think of is to try and get him to lower his wage demands for his next move.

 

[johnmc]

Looks like a briefing. The only reason I could think of is to try and get him to lower his wage demands for his next move.

By telling people he's a distruptive influence?

 

[almir]

Nasri in being a bellend shock. Hold the back pages. This is why consecutive managers have shipped him off on loan to all those who were like "why don't we keep him?"

If one is consecutive, than fair play to you.

 

[almir]

By telling people he's a distruptive influence?

yep, no way city would brief this. It's probably his agent. Trying to push price down to get some signing fee.

 

[pavelsrnicek]

By telling people he's a distruptive influence?

For all the papers to have the same story sounds like a briefing. I can't think of any other good reason for doing it though

 

[johnmc]

yep, no way city would brief this. It's probably his agent. Trying to push price down to get some signing fee.

Why would his agent tell anyone he's a disruptive influence?

 

[sir baconface]

If one is consecutive, than fair play to you.

Are you unanimous in that view? ;)

 

[almir]

Why would his agent tell anyone he's a disruptive influence?

if he has a deal with some club already but needs to push the price down, than it would make a sense.

 

[Kinkys Left Foot]

A city source you say.....mmmm

Must be true the papers wouldn't make anything like that up for clicks would they?

 

[johnmc]

if he has a deal with some club already but needs to push the price down, than it would make a sense.

If he has a deal elsewhere yes possibly, if he hasn't then it won't be the club or agent. Probably just the truth.

 

[almir]

If he has a deal elsewhere yes possibly, if he hasn't then it won't be the club or agent. Probably just the truth.

I wouldn't exclude the truth if it wasn't 3 papers at same time. One paper may find out about something but for 3 to run the story at same time, it's surely a brief. The only question imo is from which side but I can't see how is this good for City in any way. Doubt players are stupid enough to do it, it's surely not in club's interest.