Media Thread 2017/18

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That **** Jamie jackson had 2 articles out within 20 mins of the rag game a match report praising them and a hatchet job on ederson.

Today not even a match report up to now from the guardian wankers
 
urban genie said:
That **** Jamie jackson had 2 articles out within 20 mins of the rag game a match report praising them and a hatchet job on ederson.

Today not even a match report up to now from the guardian wankers
Click to expand...

He knows its a waste of time click wise! We get beat a player to slate get it written and there rapid clicks galore sad its the media we live in now.
 
It's like the two matches didn't happen. Would be so different if rags won or if Ederson let a goal in.
 
Jackson was in Maryland covering United's defeat to Barcelona, and filed a match report shortly after. Probably why he hasn't reported on City's game which took place in LA.

Don't know why people don't just enjoy our performance, rather than going out looking for any perceived snubs or injustices. It's an odd, victim mentality.
 
Ric said:
Jackson was in Maryland covering United's defeat to Barcelona, and filed a match report shortly after. Probably why he hasn't reported on City's game which took place in LA.

Don't know why people don't just enjoy our performance, rather than going out looking for any perceived snubs or injustices. It's an odd, victim mentality.
Click to expand...

Or its challenging in the main, a publicly funded media organisation that is supposed to show impartiality and balance.

To suggest the BBC is anything but bias when it comes to its football coverage is burying your head in the sand as far as i'm concerned and as for other media outlets, all just click bait but given they are there to make money we can't really complain but we can still point it out, especially the weasels who are writing the shit.
 
Ric said:
There you go, second lead article on their football home page:

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40738003
Click to expand...
2 comments so far Ric..


amusing to say the least.

  • 2. Posted byHammock
    onJust now
    Man City a joke of a club, did you spot their 4 fans in the crowd.

    A nothing game, it means nothing.
  • Comment number1. Posted byHedgehog
    on3 minutes ago
    It was a friendly.... they have spent 300 million this window.

    They wont beat RM in a real match


Lol...you can feel the hurt.
 
Ric said:
Jackson was in Maryland covering United's defeat to Barcelona, and filed a match report shortly after. Probably why he hasn't reported on City's game which took place in LA.

Don't know why people don't just enjoy our performance, rather than going out looking for any perceived snubs or injustices. It's an odd, victim mentality.
Click to expand...

And the report cited 'Uniteds underwhelming display'. Of course this failed to get a mention.
Hart of the Matter said:
Wow, have you read our match report on BBC in beating Real Madrid 4-1 though (no - neither have I!!!!)
Click to expand...

Well it is there, you should do. Look under the headline Manchester City thrash Real Madrid.
 
blueinsa said:
I didn't click on the Irish football section though Frank, it was on the main page under main videos.

Again, im amazed that U15 friendlies are now being classed as main news thats all.
Click to expand...

Just found it under Newcastle and Southampton (beat United) winning matches in the same tournament. They are certainly biased for Newcastle and Southampton.
 
Last edited:
Note on the BBC article. Another list on how much we spent and no mention of Ushited defeat in the headlines but report hidden at the bottom of the page.
 
Ric said:
Jackson was in Maryland covering United's defeat to Barcelona, and filed a match report shortly after. Probably why he hasn't reported on City's game which took place in LA.

Don't know why people don't just enjoy our performance, rather than going out looking for any perceived snubs or injustices. It's an odd, victim mentality.
Click to expand...
It's the one relic of the past that some don't seem able to shake off and it cannot be a good thing. I would think it makes life somewhat unenjoyable, always searching out negatives and then being affronted by it.
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
It's the one relic of the past that some don't seem able to shake off and it cannot be a good thing. I would think it makes life somewhat unenjoyable, always searching out negatives and then being affronted by it.
Click to expand...

Not just that the constant 'they would not say that about United', 'if united had done that' actually undermines the valid grievances which are out there and worthy of discussion.
 
The BBC didn't have the Manchester derby friendly game on the main site at all, so much so that when I looked to check the result I thought we'd must have won! At least they have a positive headline on the main page for this. (City thrash Madrid). Yes the constant mention of players' fees is annoying and inconsistent but let's just laugh at it and let it over our heads.
 
Had to scroll down past the darts in the Mail online, rags were headlines though, not a bad match report though it was full of praise for Sterling, Express, nothing, not a bean, Star nothing, just about to check others out
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top