Media Thread 2017/18

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We're not really here said:
Frankly if you read the scum and or listen to talkshite then I am concerned about you. Just ignore the wankers. If people stopped buying, listening or clicking on they would soon change or hopefully fold for good.
Click to expand...


Out of the 3 million talksport listeners 4 million sun readers I'd expect the % of blues is tiny and wouldn't affect their ratings at all so they wouldn't give a shit if we all fucked them off, their aim is to appease the rag/dipper hoards so a negative story about us will have the aforementioned rag/dipper ****s nodding sagely at how City is ruining football, while they continue to suck on the stump of rag/dipper cock their ratings will stay high, all we as Blues can do is carry on pointing out their shite in the hope that the rest of the football world sees it for what it is
 
jimharri said:
And someone on there saying that Jackson is a Forest fan. Riiight.
Click to expand...
Daniel Taylor is a Forest fan. Jamie Jackson is a Utd fan.

Most journalists can be objective, and the Guardian's football staff predict City to finish 1st, but obviously Jame Jackson does not share that opinion. Quite a hostile write-up of Guardiola's management
 
Talksport rely on saying something stupid so you'll give them free advertising by writing about them.

A thread about them in the general section is exactly what they want.
 
argyle said:
Talksport rely on saying something stupid so you'll give them free advertising by writing about them.

A thread about them in the general section is exactly what they want.
Click to expand...
I suspect they pay very little attention to posts on message boards. It has very little impact on them.
 
Marvin said:
Daniel Taylor is a Forest fan. Jamie Jackson is a Utd fan.

Most journalists can be objective, and the Guardian's football staff predict City to finish 1st, but obviously Jame Jackson does not share that opinion. Quite a hostile write-up of Guardiola's management
Click to expand...

It's a shame he's blocked me on twitter else I'd have called the Cnut out on this.
 
moomba said:
I suspect they pay very little attention to posts on message boards. It has very little impact on them.
Click to expand...

Wasn't the point I was making. Talking about them gives them free publicity, so more people tune in to hear the shit they say.
 
argyle said:
Wasn't the point I was making. Talking about them gives them free publicity, so more people tune in to hear the shit they say.
Click to expand...
I don't think they do. I've never read one of these threads and thought "oh, I'll go and have a listen". More likely to do that if I hear of a paper or other form of media putting out quality.
 
Gray said:
BBC best goals 2007-12, need I say anymore?
Click to expand...

pmsl i saw that plastered somewhere and remember thinking 'what an odd set of years to focus on... oh ffs give me strength'. In all my days i can safely say the other video lists like this have always been 'best of the 00's' or something. I found it funny and pathetic in a comical sense.
 
Marvin said:
Daniel Taylor is a Forest fan. Jamie Jackson is a Utd fan.

Most journalists can be objective, and the Guardian's football staff predict City to finish 1st, but obviously Jame Jackson does not share that opinion. Quite a hostile write-up of Guardiola's management
Click to expand...

Yes, its quite surreal considering that the article starts by predicting that we will win the league.
 
TCIB said:
pmsl i saw that plastered somewhere and remember thinking 'what an odd set of years to focus on... oh ffs give me strength'. In all my days i can safely say the other video lists like this have always been 'best of the 00's' or something. I found it funny and pathetic in a comical sense.
Click to expand...

not to be a smartarse but theyve been doing them in batches of 5 years from 1992 as it's the 25th premier league or something
 
moomba said:
I don't think they do. I've never read one of these threads and thought "oh, I'll go and have a listen". More likely to do that if I hear of a paper or other form of media putting out quality.
Click to expand...

So if there was a slanderous/derogatory article about United you would not buy the paper or click on the link?
 
franksinatra said:
So if there was a slanderous/derogatory article about United you would not buy the paper or click on the link?
Click to expand...
Not if it was reproduced on here. And if I did it wouldnt be because someone was talking about it on a United forum.
 
moomba said:
Not if it was reproduced on here. And if I did it wouldnt be because someone was talking about it on a United forum.
Click to expand...

No I completely understand that. Similarly I would not have any interest in buying a paper clicking on a link because I heard it was an anti-united article.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top