MellowJoe
Well-Known Member
Your one and only argument is "I like animals and it upsets me that you eat them".
Now tell me, since I'm only using facts and evidence and scientific opinion, how I'm the one sounding like a religious nut? They tend to tell others have to live their lives, they tend to rely on their feelings, they ignore nature and facts and science, it again, like the tiny penis jibe, seems as if you're projecting, my ashen little solider.
Your 'God/nature made us this way' has been your only argument. I said weeks ago it was fallacy, you begged to differ for some peculiar reason. Again, I am not arguing the eating of dead meat.. that would be preposterous. I argue ethics. I am arguing about owning other sentient creatures, harming them, slaughtering them. You apparently think it's a-ok.. hence you are ignorant on the subject.
I rely on science. The science that says fish, cows, pigs, chickens, sheep are all richly sentient. I rely on anti-speciesism. I rely on value. I rely on respecting sentience. Obviously you do not.