Mine took it up to 531. Link above.Here's the link
LETS ALL VOTE FOR ST PAUL'S HERE
https://www.mandsenergyfund.com/pro...ool-crompton-street-led-lighting-upgrade/vote
Mine took it up to 531. Link above.Here's the link
LETS ALL VOTE FOR ST PAUL'S HERE
https://www.mandsenergyfund.com/pro...ool-crompton-street-led-lighting-upgrade/vote
just voted now up to 538Mine took it up to 531. Link above.
Is that true? What if you were the original dave Smith and wondered why you keep getting mail for dave.smith dave-smith etcDid you know, you can add “+” and anything to a gmail address and it will go to the same address. Also punctuation in gmail addresses is ignored.
So, the following are all the same.
davesmith@gmail.com
dave.smith@gmail.com
dave-smith@gmail.com
dave.smith+bluemoon@gmail.com
dave.smith+stpauls@gmail.com
d.a.v.e.s.m.i.t.h@gmail.com
dave.smith+spam@gmail.com
Websites rarely know this when you subscribe to them.
@quiet_riot this from the fc fans forum
It's a marathon not a sprint and those divvy idiots are just giving St Paul's false hope when the fake email addresses are removed.
I imagine the people who put all the work into St Paul's bid will be apoplectic if they are kicked out due to the bitters trying to rig the voting.
He wouldn’t, because all those other permutations aren’t offered as new email addresses after Dave Smith secured the address.Is that true? What if you were the original dave Smith and wondered why you keep getting mail for dave.smith dave-smith etc
They had no issue getting people from outside the M40 postcode area writing letters of support to the council using addresses from inside M40 when the application to build Pallet Park was in process.Thanks for that - I don't think we will get any votes removed as there are definitely no fake emails being used
"We're voting for our club. They're voting for something they don't give a fuck about in order to preclude a legitimate, genuine wish.
Makes me laugh. They want funding to be able to improve their bar area so fans can enjoy a drink in more nicer area than they currently do, to make more money for their club (no issue with that). However, the guise that ''local people can then hire out the facility'' so really we want this because it is of benefit to ''the community'' is the biggest laugh. The same way hardly anyone in ''the community'' hires their function room out! They are con merchants! Their idea of being a ''community club'' is that the community should pay for it!
When you look at the other nominees, there are Scout groups and other voluntary groups who maybe have 50 members or so who don't stand a chance of winning, yet are probably very deserving of funding. This is a semi pro football club with 3000 or so co-owners (so they proudly tell us) who want to do up their bar to make more money. It's shamefull of M&S that their application was even considered.they are also wrong, i want better funding for a school, any school in preference to a badly run social club with a sports team attachment. Therefore I am voting for I believe in and care about.
disingenuous fuckers
It's shamefull of M&S that their application was even considered.
Voted.
https://www.mandsenergyfund.com/leaderboard
Click on the above. Select North West region. To vote you just enter your email and create a password - easy enough to unsubscribe if you ever get any junk mail.
Do it!