kaz7
Well-Known Member
Yep the whole media have showed an appalling lack of interest in how eddie is,even at the time,Sky should hang their heads in shame
That'll be the day.Yep the whole media have showed an appalling lack of interest in how eddie is,even at the time,Sky should hang their heads in shame
I remember the commentator laughing then saying it was a "1950s type challenge"No the 5-0 thrashing is irrelevant when the injustices of one of there history clubs get one of there players sent off!
Funny when a Bournemouth player took Jesus out with a 2 footed tackle and not even a yellow motd never even mentioned it! Seems the narrative regarding Manchester City players in the media is totally different.
Evidence of what i said immediately after the incident. Sky and the rest have set the narrative in an attempt to sway the FA and let him off his 3 game ban.
They run the fucking game in this country!
One rule change that I would like to see is if a player has to substituted due to an injury arising out of a red card offence (as happened with Ederson yesterday) then it shouldn't be counted as one of his team's three substitutions.
It's a squad game more than ever now but (again to use yesterday's example) City's tactical options off the bench were limited through Liverpool's foul play.
I know it didn't make any difference yesterday (unless your name is Ben Foden and you were hoping for a late debut) but it might in another, closer game.
Lets see what the little shits have to say on MNF tomorrowThat'll be the day.
Evidence of what i said immediately after the incident. Sky and the rest have set the narrative in an attempt to sway the FA and let him off his 3 game ban.
They run the fucking game in this country!
I'm not clicking on that,what does it say?http://metro.co.uk/2017/09/10/rahee...fter-manchester-city-thump-liverpool-6916309/
Truly disgraceful behaviour again from Sterling!
People who say that the best things in life are free clearly haven't ever picked up a copy of Metro.
What? Feigning of injury due to a red card? Why would somebody on the end of a red incident feign injury to be substituted?Agree but only if need to sub goalie, otherwise feigning of injury will take place
Fuck me, that's one piece of absolute donkey spunk reporting. No wonder the cûnt who wrote it didn't dare put his name to it.http://metro.co.uk/2017/09/10/rahee...fter-manchester-city-thump-liverpool-6916309/
Truly disgraceful behaviour again from Sterling!
People who say that the best things in life are free clearly haven't ever picked up a copy of Metro.
Fuck me, that's one piece of absolute donkey spunk reporting. No wonder the cûnt who wrote it didn't dare put his name to it.
Incredible stuff.
http://metro.co.uk/2017/09/10/rahee...fter-manchester-city-thump-liverpool-6916309/
Truly disgraceful behaviour again from Sterling!
People who say that the best things in life are free clearly haven't ever picked up a copy of Metro.
Total bullshit reporting of course as he/she would not have privy to that location at that time.
I still do not know why you read such crap. If everyone ignored them they would soon be out of a job. Not bought a paper in 20 years.
Tactical change as your essentially suggesting extra substituteWhat? Feigning of injury due to a red card? Why would somebody on the end of a red incident feign injury to be substituted?
Still suffering from wounds taken at the Alamo John?
Nope, he's still getting over having his knob cut off by his wife Lorena! No wonder he reads the Metro!Still suffering from wounds taken at the Alamo John?