bluetonium
Well-Known Member
They need a consistency check on the message they want to convey about each match.
For example, in our game they showed highlights that suggested a similar level of chances each. Then the pundits went on to talk about our total domination, but anyone who didn't watch the match would have a hard time figuring that out from the clips they showed.
Don't know if they do it to have appeal to both sets of fans regardless of the game itself, but in games such as yesterday it creates a huge mismatch between visual evidence and their opinions and conclusions.
For example, in our game they showed highlights that suggested a similar level of chances each. Then the pundits went on to talk about our total domination, but anyone who didn't watch the match would have a hard time figuring that out from the clips they showed.
Don't know if they do it to have appeal to both sets of fans regardless of the game itself, but in games such as yesterday it creates a huge mismatch between visual evidence and their opinions and conclusions.