Alexis Sanchez

[Neville Kneville]

Alvez took the piss out of him last night.

 

[I'm no cynic but...]

Not a chance Sanchez will go for 20m.
At least double probably 50/60m.
You will have City,PSG, utd, offering players plus cash.

The could have all done that last summer when he had a year left on his contract but they didn't do it then and they won't do it in January with him being six months older and the value of his registration falling towards zero. What makes you think that PSG, the rags and the rest will suddenly see Sanchez as being all sweetness and light right now when they didn't see that last summer?

 

[Marvin]

Yes you’ve said much the same thing in the previous 199 posts of yours on the thread. Now you’re at 200 and counting. That’s 7% of the thread or 1 in 14 posts.

That's quite amusing from someone who has over 50,000 comments many of which are abusive.

 

[abu13]

It will be interesting to see what happens here, If Sanchez really digs his heels in to come to us then we will get him for less than £30 million. If he just wants out of Arsenal and is happy to go to any of a number of clubs then it will become an auction. The one person holding all the cards is Sanchez, it seems he had his heart set on coming to us in August and don't forget that the Tarquins DID agree to sell him. If we and Sanchez have an agreement in place then it will happen.

 

[SWP's back]

That's quite amusing from someone who has over 50,000 comments many of which are abusive.

For which you’re welcome.

Let me know when I become a meme like yourself.

 

[SWP's back]

Can anyone understand what Fblole means when he says City signing him for a reported £20m in January means it will cost City £1.5m per game (excl. wages) and thus it will not happen. Whereas City buying him for £60m in the summer (which we agreed to) would have made it more cost efficient?

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

Can anyone understand what Fblole means when he says City signing him for a reported £20m in January means it will cost City £1.5m per game (excl. wages) and this it will not happen. Whereas City buying him for £60m in the summer (which we agreed to) would have made it more cost efficient?

not really, it's not like we amortise on a per game basis.

 

[Dribble]

It's the truth though mate, look at our results and the part he's played.

Arsenal 4 - 3 Leicester - 0 mins
Stoke 1 - 0 Arsenal - 0 mins
Liverpool 4 - 0 Arsenal - 62mins
Arsenal 3 - 0 Bournemouth - 16mins
Arsenal 3 - 1 Cologne - 90mins - Goal
Chelsea 0 - 0 Arsenal - 24mins
Arsenal 1 - 0 Doncaster - 90mins
Arsenal 2 - 0 West Brom - 83mins
Bate Borisov 2 - 4 Arsenal - 0mins
Arsenal 2 - 0 Brighton - 90mins

I think it's fair to say apart from the Cologne game he's not had that much of a decisive influence so far in games. I'm not criticising the man, he's not slacking, he's not moping, he's putting in the effort & doing everything asked of him, he's just not had the influence that he had last season in deciding games as of yet. That might hopefully still come.

Ever considered he might just be saving himself?

 

[MCFC1993]

Wouldn't take any of his form into account so far this season; the guy thought he was moving to us in August; Champions League contenders and currently top of the Premier League and the way Arsenal let him down on deadline day is more than enough to mess with his head.

Despite how well we've started we still need him. Look at this weekend against Stoke; Aguero is injured and Jesus has played a competitive game against Chile and a high altitude game in Bolivia in less than a week, add the travelling and he's going to be knackered.

 

[johnnytapia]

Alvez took the piss out of him last night.

Poor Marvin.