Duncan Castles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Nauseating responses and just avoids the real questions. Just confirms what we all know.
"Would you have sent that tweet if it was the other way around –if Man Utd got a late winner at Bournemouth and Man City had lost at Huddersfield?

DC: “It’s pretty hard to react to a counterfactual, hypothetical scenario"

Avoided giving an answer. Wanker.
 
Why bother reading anything he puts out? The guy is clearly a deluded prick who enjoys fanning the flames.

Our league position is the perfect response to that guy. Nothing else needed.
 
"Would you have sent that tweet if it was the other way around –if Man Utd got a late winner at Bournemouth and Man City had lost at Huddersfield?

DC: “It’s pretty hard to react to a counterfactual, hypothetical scenario"

Avoided giving an answer. Wanker.
A simple no from him would have been fine. He really is a detestable arsehole.
 
Why bother reading anything he puts out? The guy is clearly a deluded prick who enjoys fanning the flames.

Our league position is the perfect response to that guy. Nothing else needed.
He basically admits to being a wum in the article, helps drive traffic through his articles. Clearly not a very clever one.
 
Well, if he is wumming to create traffic, he's doing a great job - 50 pages on here.
 
Noticed a article on the same page as the Castles interview saying Mourinho has criticised the support again in tonights match programme,have a feeling the sour-faced **** is working on his exit strategy already.
 
Just out of interest what will this chap do when Mourinho goes? His actions have shown him to be a mouthpiece for hire so his actual football journalistic credibility must be very low. I mean when his Mouinho exclusives dry up no paper will see a reason to keep him, surely he see's this. You see Ducker and others openly mocking him, i think this say's a lot when they do not even do it in pm.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top