Sorry mate i am useless at that stuff .if you just google it on MEN you will see it good luck
Posted by @cyberblue
I realise there is a media thread but what was written to day by Samuel Luckhurst was aboslutley outrageous .and well below the belt .For the Evening News to be advocating for the F A to look into Peps discussion with a Southampton player with with the clear ipmlication that a ban should be the order of the day .It bad enough it being written by a Uni*d journalist but it must of been been aproved by the the Sports editor as well .Disgracfull piece of journalism doent come close to describe it .It something expected from the Sun not our local paper
Can you link?
I realise there is a media thread but what was written to day by Samuel Luckhurst was aboslutley outrageous .and well below the belt .For the Evening News to be advocating for the F A to look into Peps discussion with a Southampton player with with the clear ipmlication that a ban should be the order of the day .It bad enough it being written by a Uni*d journalist but it must of been been aproved by the the Sports editor as well .Disgracfull piece of journalism doent come close to describe it .It something expected from the Sun not our local paper
I've just read a piece in the MEN ridiculing any claims to discipline Pep for the conversation. That's how it works, shock jock polarising stuff, just like when there are two presenters on Talk Sport.
Getting you in a lather is what they want.
National media maybe, but not your local paper FFS!
Phil Thompson was waxing lyrical about City in general and Sterling in particular on SSN today. Talk about the worm turning and long may it continue.
The writer has got the numbers the wrong way round. What he meant to say was that City's lead was about to shrink from 8 points to 6 points when Sterling scored.
Dont think so mate it an outrageous piece of journalism by our local paper and i am perfectly entitled to express my view simply doing nothing or agreeing with it is giving him a green light.what would you say if Pep got banned due to his reporting of the incidentBrennan has countered it by ridiculing it. That's what much of the media does - gives 2 sides to stimulate "debate". Listen to Talksport as the perfect example.
By getting into a lather you are playing into their hands.
Dont think so mate it an outrageous piece of journalism by our local paper and i am perfectly entitled to express my view simply doing nothing or agteeing with it is giving him a green light.what would you say if Pep got banned due to his reporting of the incident
City & City reserves.Of course they do. There are two teams in Manchester and they are just trying to appeal to both sets of fans. It's extremely old-fashioned, time-served journalism to try to fool the readers into getting outraged and joining a debate.
One of the main reasons the MEN is a commercial basket case is because of this sort of mindless clickbait. Over the years they have managed to alienate both City and United fans because of this sort of juvenile coverage. Most of the users of their website are overseas rags fans (and probably increasing numbers of non-local City fans) but its local readers they need so they can attract regional advertising revenue. Their mindless sports coverage is accelerating their demise.This is just as outrageous, though. http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.../man-city-guardiola-redmond-reaction-13975481
They want you to be outraged. It keeps them alive.