Indeed, I was sort of joking tbhNo, he should ask them why he has to explain complimenting an opposition player when Wenger wasn't asked to explain why he deliberately wrongly accused one of our players of diving.
Indeed, I was sort of joking tbhNo, he should ask them why he has to explain complimenting an opposition player when Wenger wasn't asked to explain why he deliberately wrongly accused one of our players of diving.
On the Daily Fail site story they have included a box titled "REDMOND'S STATEMENT IN FULL". How come then that it is NOT his statement in full? Like the snakes they are, they have left out his final paragraph which reads as follows-
"Sadly this story is an example of lazy journalism and is a complete joke. It does no favours to the sports journalists in the game that I like, happily work with and genuinely respect".
Great respect to Nathan, total disrespect to that sleazeball excuse for a newspaper who claim a statement in full yet leave out the embarrassing bit. A downright lie then.
You can see Redmond smiling on the MotD footage: he does not look in the least bit bothered by Pep's "antics".
Of course Pep shouldn't be seen talking to an opponent and showing emotion: this is England after all.
But would it be worthy of an investigation or ban?I know im going to be in the minority here......
But what he did was not right ( whatever the content of what he said ). looking at it from a neutral point of view I would be livid if Wenger/Klopp/Mourinho or any other manager did exactly the same in public at end of a game to any City player.
I have no issue with any manager shaking hands with opposition players and passing a general 'well played / unlucky' comment as they trot off the pitch - but to say Pep didn't take it too far is pushing it for me.
would we be happy if say Klopp said positive things in the same way to Stirling as City left the pitch at Anfield after conceding a very late losing goal...............I think not !
You can see Redmond smiling on the MotD footage: he does not look in the least bit bothered by Pep's "antics".
Of course Pep shouldn't be seen talking to an opponent and showing emotion: this is England after all.
The sun must have a huge legal department to enable it to function the way it does on blatant lies and fabrication, they are good at what they do.
I hope pep brings that up,it's clearly a witch hunt against pep lead by the media,different rules apply to usWhy was Wenger allowed to call an established England international a cheat and no explanation was required , and yet Pep compliments an England international as confirmed by the player himself , and the F.A. decide to take action , you would think there was an agenda going on.
I hope pep brings that up,it's clearly a witch hunt against pep lead by the media,different rules apply to us
If only..So who in the FA has made this decision to investigate, why and on what grounds. I hope City’s legal team are all over this, it’s time to bite back.
It happens every single derby week,it's nauseating and so obviousCoincidentally the witch hunt is in full swing barely a week before a derby game , i would put money on a loop on Sky for the next week or so , of one of our players for aggressive breathing
https://www.independent.ie/sport/so...night-and-it-was-ugly-to-behold-36368226.html
To use an Irish colloquialism (had to google that spelling!); Gobshite. I'd like to hear his opinions on PEG's eye gouging antics, or what he thinks about the scandalous treament Eva Carneiro received from the "Special One" (for simply doing her job).
Tall poppy syndrome and it' a back handed compliment.I hope pep brings that up,it's clearly a witch hunt against pep lead by the media,different rules apply to us
Sorry if this has been posted anywhere already jve had a quick look about but didn't see anything but look at this latest gem from Sly to appease the rag army! Desperado!!
Check out @conal_fitz’s Tweet: