Doesn't start again today for Southampton.
Would be a great signing.. Only question is will he happy on the bench?
Doesn't start again today for Southampton.
Would be a great signing.. Only question is will he happy on the bench?
Wouldn't be on the bench for long..... Hes very very good.Would be a great signing.. Only question is will he happy on the bench?
Can folks stop repeating the "cut price" Bonnuci. He went for what he was worth. Saying City or Chelsea would have paid more is simply conjecture.
You seem to be trying to explain away everything. But there on likes the point. You can get fantastic quality for less than 45 million. I.e Practically everyone who moved.
That you all have explanations for why the prices were low is simply your conclusory positions. I'm just staying the facts.
if he's coming to us we are going to have to pay the going rate from an English club ,fair has got nothing to do with it.So it looks like either we are getting Virgil. Hope the price is fair.
A lot of crap get reported. I only believe what actually happens. Not made up newspaper stories.This was widely, widely reported. If Bonucci was open to moving to England he would've easily gone for 60 million, I can't believe that is even up for debate.
Literally, sure. Metaphorically? What league exactly is VVD in? A good defender who plays for a midtable team? I'd say so. Rudiger? Bonucci? Skrinnier? Lindelof? All played at higer levelsThe players you listed weren't in the same league (literally and metaphorically) as VVD at the time of their transfers. That was the purpose of going through the list.
What facts are false? You all keep saying this. But backing up your claim you with nothing but rumors and opinions. The facts are clear. Point out a CB who has moved for over 50 million. There isn't one.We're trying to get the best players, there are only a few at the very top level and scarcity drives prices. I can't tell if you're being intentionally obstinate or not but your "facts" are either completely false or irrelevant.
He wasn't just benched. He was removed from the game day squad. That's literally a "he is gone" move.If he does come, he could become one of the best under Pep, having seen how he's improved Ota and Stones in 1 year is crazy. Anyone who comes in will be improved in this team. Exciting times.
Indication from him being benched at Southampton is he is moving sooner rather than later.
Well, nothing you said opposes my position.
1. I never said the market didn't get inflated. I said it didn't any more than usual.
2. And that no one moved for over 50 suggest there was no unusual inflation.
3. Lots of top CBs moved. And they didn't cost 50 or more. Not to suggest a player can't move for over 50 million. But that should be the exception, not the rule.
4. If the world best CB wanted to move from one top club to another, Perhaps!
But I'm.sorry Southampton is on no position to be demanding 20 million above the the world record price. That's just silly!
Cool. Let's all just belief what we want. It won't be the first time in here.Didn't inflate more than usual my ass :)
Lukaku, Morata ,neymar, Mbappe, Walker, Mendi, Bakayoko, that guy Liverpool bought from german club for next summer, Chelsea were willing to pay 60m for Sandro etc, etc... none of these would be half of what they were 2-3 years ago.
And 3. is so awful argument it's appalling. Only Bonucci from top class CB's moved and it was mentioned many times why he went for less than he could in normal circumstances. If he went to England he would cost easily over 50m.
He wasn't just benched. He was removed from the game day squad. That's literally a "he is gone" move.
I think we will go back to 3 at the back when he come and Mangala will be moved.
Stones is back soon and Capt is back now. So there will be a good core at CB come January.
Mmm, we paid around £50M for Stones over a year ago, since when the transfer market appears to have inflated. We have paid the same for two full backs who are generally less expensive than centre backs. We have paid a near record amount for a goalkeeper.The facts are clear. Point out a CB who has moved for over 50 million. There isn't one.
Mmm, we paid around £50M for Stones over a year ago, since when the transfer market appears to have inflated. We have paid the same for two full backs who are generally less expensive than centre backs. We have paid a near record amount for a goalkeeper.
VVD is sought after by Liverpool, Chelsea and ourselves, he has many years left on his contract, I would be amazed if he didn't command a premium price.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-sign-van-dijk-14074584Mmm, we paid around £50M for Stones over a year ago, since when the transfer market appears to have inflated. We have paid the same for two full backs who are generally less expensive than centre backs. We have paid a near record amount for a goalkeeper.
VVD is sought after by Liverpool, Chelsea and ourselves, he has many years left on his contract, I would be amazed if he didn't command a premium price.
Yes! he only listed Milan Skrinnier.Yeah but Milan Škriniar, who no one had ever heard of before a few months ago, moved from Sampdoria for significantly less, so ergo it's way too much. The facts are clear.