cleavers
Moderator
Its being used because liverpool are losing, wait till united get a version....The second one shouldn't have been referred, and suggests the VAR is being used for 'might be off'
Its being used because liverpool are losing, wait till united get a version....The second one shouldn't have been referred, and suggests the VAR is being used for 'might be off'
possible foul on the touch line,the build up came from that throw inNo it doesn't. There was nothing contentious or anyone questionably offside for that goal.
It is because it's a reffing mistake.
The var should only be for real shocking decisions not a marginal offside or a routine shirt pull, half of which are not given.
If WBA's 3rd goal had been one toe offside, it would have been cancelled out.
All the people backing this are going to be fucking gutted if it stays with us in this form.
No it doesn't. There was nothing contentious or anyone questionably offside for that goal.
Always a great atmosphere when Liverpool are behind.
Exactly. No more hugging each other in a moment of pure emotion. When my cock is hard in a moment of lust I don't suddenly fucking wait 3 minutes to decideFootball is an instantaneous outpouring of emotion not let's wait 3 minutes and cheer... or not.
Its being used because liverpool are losing, wait till united get a version....
Exactly. No more hugging each other in a moment of pure emotion. When my cock is hard in a moment of lust I don't suddenly fucking wait 3 minutes to decide
Not made a difference? He has made them worse, to be fair.On the plus side, WBA are winning and Dick Van Dyck doesn't seem to have made a difference at all.
Thanks
That moment will never be taken away from me, its history ;-)
Haha, is it ? We'll see.This is dangerously close to paranoia.
Because unfortunately Liverpool are able to summon a fuck or two to give when they play us.Why can’t we do this at candlefield