The VAR has been correct. Well done the VAR. That wasn’t my point.I said it would kill the game as we know it. Watch the Liverpool game and you’ll see, and thanks for your praise by the way, that I am, in fact, 100% correct. I await my call from the FA informing me they’ve recognised the folly of this utterly shite and already disproven system.The VAR decisions have been spot on. But if you say you’re 100% correct then you must be.
I’m sure the FA will take your observations on board and “bin it now” lol.
The VAR has been correct. Well done the VAR. That wasn’t my point.I said it would kill the game as we know it. Watch the Liverpool game and you’ll see, and thanks for your praise by the way, that I am, in fact, 100% correct. I await my call from the FA informing me they’ve recognised the folly of this utterly shite and already disproven system.
I enjoyed the game last night and every other game I’ve watched where VAR has been used. VAR consultations take no longer than players time wasting or faking injury, and any time taken to consult VAR can be added at the end of the match - we could call it something like ‘added time’ or ‘stoppage time’ or something? You can always switch off and never watch a game again, I’m sure football will survive in your absence.The VAR has been correct. Well done the VAR. That wasn’t my point.I said it would kill the game as we know it. Watch the Liverpool game and you’ll see, and thanks for your praise by the way, that I am, in fact, 100% correct. I await my call from the FA informing me they’ve recognised the folly of this utterly shite and already disproven system.
I’m sure it would. And it will survive VAR-less football which is where we’ll end up once we see time and time again how it’s ruining the game. You think differently, that’s fine, but I’m confident it’ll get canned.I enjoyed the game last night and every other game I’ve watched where VAR has been used. VAR consultations take no longer than players time wasting or faking injury, and any time taken to consult VAR can be added at the end of the match - we could call it something like ‘added time’ or ‘stoppage time’ or something? You can always switch off and never watch a game again, I’m sure football will survive in your absence.
No it wasnt a clear foul, nor was it a clear and obvious error as per stipulation.
The VAR wasn't correct at Liverpool wasn't correct at Chelsea.
In Italy:
Bianconeri captain Gianluigi Buffon was more vocal in his criticism, and called for less decisions to go to review, even if it meant there would be less penalties awarded as a result. “You told us that VAR would be used in clear-cut incidents where there were mistakes, but now you are even checking the replays for a trodden toe or a finger in an ear. It’s no longer football that way, it’s turning into water polo,” Buffon said.
“It takes too long, as I didn’t even celebrate when we were awarded a penalty, because six minutes had passed. Last season we had three penalties in our favour, but if it carries on like this, we’ll have 50. I’m happy with that as a Juventino, but it ruins the entertainment factor.”
If the veteran goalkeeper was complaining about too many incidents going to review, Roma were vocal about quite the opposite on Saturday evening. TV showed that Diego Perotti was clearly fouled inside the penalty area but – to the perplexity of all those who were watching – the referee never even consulted VAR.
“Daniele De Rossi went over, as captain, to ask why the referee wasn’t checking the VAR, Perotti told reporters after the match. “He replied that there was nothing in it.It was clearly a penalty, everyone saw it. They ended up giving a corner, but he never touched the ball.I hope someone will come out and explain why the penalty wasn’t given. I don’t understand why those watching the monitors didn’t see it. I don’t have much faith in VAR after this, because if we had scored that penalty, we’d have been 2-0 up and game over.”
Sound familiar ?
Your talking crap. It was clearly right at Liverpool
There aren't many stadiums in this country that can support VAR, and somehow I don't see the FA stumping up the cash for clubs who can't afford it.
The poor clubs, what do they do when they've a home match picked for TV if their stadiums can't support cameras?There aren't many stadiums in this country that can fully support VAR and somehow I don't see the FA stumping up the cash for clubs who can't afford it.
Wtf.... do you even know how much money is in this league. You have to be a plant, no one can have this viewpoint in the real world surely
The poor clubs, what do they do when they've a home match picked for TV if their stadiums can't support cameras?
They could ask the League of Ireland for advice, think they got it sorted for about 5k a club.
I don't see VAR fully working in this country,
Wow.... no more words needed
What else is needed apart from the cameras, could you give us a list?It's a bit more too it than TV cameras. I was taken back when Bristol City couldn't use it in their game.
Yes, of course, because it's a unique country, a special country.I don't see VAR fully working in this country,