Talksport

Murphy is a fucking idiot, doesnt want to see tackling taken out of the game when Pep wants fouls punished but suddenly today now Dele Alli has dived (again) its a non contact sport and contact means foul.
 
I’m sure I heard Murphy say at the Rochdale game is uncle is Ron futcher could it be one of our twin players from Luton ?
 
A caller saying Alli is a "cancer" in football is going too far.

(A Liverpool "fan" obviously)
 
Don’t see anything wrong with that comment.

Alli dives.
Alli cheats.
Alli isn't a nice person.
Alli isn't a very good footballer.

Seem like reasonable comments

"Alli is a "cancer" in football" on a national radio station feels seems to be over the top. And sort of seems to disrespect cancer patients.
 
Alli dives.
Alli cheats.
Alli isn't a nice person.
Alli isn't a very good footballer.

Seem like reasonable comments

"Alli is a "cancer" in football" on a national radio station feels seems to be over the top. And sort of seems to disrespect cancer patients.

It isn't disrespecting cancer patients and is in no way is intended to either. The World's full of things to get rightly aggrieved about.
 
Last edited:
Boiled Bollick and Barton we're using the Rochdale boss comments about Derty Ali's dive as justification not to have a go at the twat.

The Dipper used the wrong phrase in referring to the cheat. His point stands though.
 
It isn't disrespecting cancer patients and is in no way is intended to either. The World's full of things to get rightly aggrieved about.

Comparing Alli's diving to cancer?

I have never had cancer but members of my family have and the pain that disease causes is awful. And I am offended by talksport's editorial decision to go with the cancer analogy which seems to belittle that vicious and cruel disease.

Or maybe, as you suggest, i am getting het up over nothing.
 
Comparing Alli's diving to cancer?

I have never had cancer but members of my family have and the pain that disease causes is awful. And I am offended by talksport's editorial decision to go with the cancer analogy which seems to belittle that vicious and cruel disease.

Or maybe, as you suggest, i am getting het up over nothing.
I don't need the lecture on cancer thanks.
It's a saying, everybody knows what it means. Congratulations for being the first snowflake I've heard get hot and bothered about it.
Alas you will probably have your day and the use of it will be banned in these clamour to be offended times
 
The hilarious bob mills putting tonight’s game in the context of yesterday’s spud’s efforts ;
‘Wigan are a much better side than Rochdale , but City are only a little better than spurs’
20 points and a hammering last time we played them better mills you twat.
 
Alli dives.
Alli cheats.
Alli isn't a nice person.
Alli isn't a very good footballer.

Seem like reasonable comments

"Alli is a "cancer" in football" on a national radio station feels seems to be over the top. And sort of seems to disrespect cancer patients.

It’s a pretty common saying and I don’t see anything bad about saying it. If he was wishing cancer on Alli then I’d say otherwise.
 
I don't need the lecture on cancer thanks.
It's a saying, everybody knows what it means. Congratulations for being the first snowflake I've heard get hot and bothered about it.
Alas you will probably have your day and the use of it will be banned in these clamour to be offended times

Alli's diving has not destroyed as many lives as cancer. It is a ludicrous and disrespectful analogy.

We would all be offended if someone said

"Sterling's diving is the AIDS of football"

So a don't get why you say "Alli's diving is a cancer in football" is ok.

What is the difference?
 
Alli's diving has not destroyed as many lives as cancer. It is a ludicrous and disrespectful analogy.

We would all be offended if someone said

"Sterling's diving is the AIDS of football"

So a don't get why you say "Alli's diving is a cancer in football" is ok.

What is the difference?
I agree, someone said my corners are like Kidney Stones, I'm writing to my MP.
 
Alli's diving has not destroyed as many lives as cancer. It is a ludicrous and disrespectful analogy.

We would all be offended if someone said

"Sterling's diving is the AIDS of football"

So a don't get why you say "Alli's diving is a cancer in football" is ok.

What is the difference?

Calling something a 'cancer' is a well-known, everyday saying.

Calling something an 'AIDS' is not.
 
Alli's diving has not destroyed as many lives as cancer. It is a ludicrous and disrespectful analogy.

We would all be offended if someone said

"Sterling's diving is the AIDS of football"

So a don't get why you say "Alli's diving is a cancer in football" is ok.

What is the difference?
And it would be ludicrous to say it's the pulmonary embolism or the eboli of football too. Youv'e converted me - take your outrage to social media and get your campaign going.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top