christ on a bike, please learn to read & understand before spouting off.
I've previously stated that i didn't think the terms used were an issue, only that the tone they were used with, and also the fact the caller didn't have the courtesy to use her name like he did with the other presenter.
So presenting a straw man like 'what if he had called Danny 'mate' is irrevelant because he didn't.
Also how the fuck do you equate to someone going OTT because they actually didn't do something? What sort of fucked up logic is that?
Your previous argument that it could be considered slightly unprofessional possibly had some merit, but the only one going OTT is you because she didn't react how you thought she should, and you then also try to justify it by making out she was aggressive when she wasn't.