We’re bombing Syria

[kiam06]

Take the BBC as close to gospel as they have the strictest journalistic standards of any organisation in the entire world.

If you don't trust the BBC, you don't trust journalism and should stick to getting news from Facebook and memes

The BBC was infiltrated many years ago by the Israeli Lobby they are probably the least trustworthy news outlet in the world today which is pretty shameful.

BBC stands for the 'Bush & Blair Corporation'.

I used to think the same way as you until I started digging a little deeper and saw it for what it was but I can understand why you think like you do it's difficult to admit your own state media is bent.

 

[blueinsa]

The BBC was infiltrated many years ago by the Israeli Lobby they are probably the least trustworthy news outlet in the world today which is pretty shameful.

BBC stands for the 'Bush & Blair Corporation'.

I used to think the same way as you until I started digging a little deeper and saw it for what it was but I can understand why you think like you do it's difficult to admit your own state media is bent.

Anti Semitic troll.

 

[SWP's back]

Anti Semitic troll.

He wasn’t overly subtle with that one.

 

[Bewar3them00n]

Anti Semitic troll.

Any time Isreal gets criticised, it’s seemingly anti Semitic. I suppose criticising Israeli soldiers using live rounds on unarmed protesters, or using them as live target practice , videoing it, showing it to their mates and bragging about it, I suppose criticising that is anti Semitic too?

 

[SWP's back]

Any time Isreal gets criticised, it’s seemingly anti Semitic. I suppose criticising Israeli soldiers using live rounds on unarmed protesters, or using them as live target practice , videoing it, showing it to their mates and bragging about it, I suppose criticising that is anti Semitic too?

No that isn’t.

But posting ‘BBC controlled by the Israel lobby’ when he means ‘Jewish owned media’ is simply anti Semitic code.

He didn’t mention the acts of Israel or Israeli soldiers in his post did he. He suggested the BBC is run by Israel (or the by the Jews if you’d like) because even he isn’t thick enough to post it outright and he knew he could rely on posters like you that would try and reason it down with the argument that Israel doesn’t mean Jew. Read his post again and see where he criticised Israel and then get back to me.

 

[Magicpole]

The BBC was infiltrated many years ago by the Israeli Lobby they are probably the least trustworthy news outlet in the world today which is pretty shameful.

BBC stands for the 'Bush & Blair Corporation'.

I used to think the same way as you until I started digging a little deeper and saw it for what it was but I can understand why you think like you do it's difficult to admit your own state media is bent.

Can you list the names of this Israeli mafia? Or is that just a throwaway statement that you put out there?

I’m not saying there isn’t, I’m asking you to back that up. If you can’t, then I would reconsider making statements that even you can’t prove.

In your own time.

 

[Damocles]

The BBC was infiltrated many years ago by the Israeli Lobby

Oh vey

 

[talkativesprout]

yrs ago i remember chatting to some Israeli soldier on ICQ . He was on his phone in some guard hut in some back street. After the usual pleasantries it got a bit dark, as he explained that a Palestinian had been shot at a local protest or something, so in retaliation kidnap gangs had vowed to kidnap and torture squaddies in his area. How much different to northern Ireland?

 

[grunge]

The BBC was infiltrated many years ago by the Israeli Lobby they are probably the least trustworthy news outlet in the world today which is pretty shameful.

BBC stands for the 'Bush & Blair Corporation'.

I used to think the same way as you until I started digging a little deeper and saw it for what it was but I can understand why you think like you do it's difficult to admit your own state media is bent.

I think you need to look into the source of that video! “Public Disturbance now”, I’m probably on a watch list from just looking into it!

 

[Homar]

Syria admitted the OPCW 11 days after the event giving themselves plenty of time to remove the evidence and threaten anyone who might have considered speaking out.

This is the common line peddled by western media. Hardly surprising that you have regurgitated it verbatim. There is simply no factual basis to it whatsoever. Removing all traces of chemicals with distinctive chemical signatures is simply impossible. Even more impossible would be to cover up the enormous scale decontamination operation required to attempt such a thing. Furthermore, they will examine the people who were supposed to have been affected and conduct interviews with the various doctors and medical staff.

 

[SWP's back]

This is the common line peddled by western media. Hardly surprising that you have regurgitated it verbatim. There is simply no factual basis to it whatsoever. Removing all traces of chemicals with distinctive chemical signatures is simply impossible. Even more impossible would be to cover up the enormous scale decontamination operation required to attempt such a thing. Furthermore, they will examine the people who were supposed to have been affected and conduct interviews with the various doctors and medical staff.

You don’t know much about chlorine gas do you.

 

[SWP's back]

Furthermore, they will examine the people who were supposed to have been affected

Straight from Russian media which you’ve swallowed like a good little sheep.

 

[Machiavelli]

Oh vey

It’s ‘Oy Vey’.
Man’s fluent in Yiddish brah. ;)

 

[west didsblue]

This is the common line peddled by western media. Hardly surprising that you have regurgitated it verbatim. There is simply no factual basis to it whatsoever. Removing all traces of chemicals with distinctive chemical signatures is simply impossible. Even more impossible would be to cover up the enormous scale decontamination operation required to attempt such a thing. Furthermore, they will examine the people who were supposed to have been affected and conduct interviews with the various doctors and medical staff.

Yes it’s “peddled” by the western media because this country and others like it has a free press that generally tends to investigate the facts rather than repeat government propaganda like RT, SANA, Press TV and Fox News.

The inspectors will examine the people that the Syrian regime allows them to examine and speak to the doctors that know what will happen if they don’t toe the regime line. There’s plenty of stories in the press already about doctors being intimidated. And if it’s chlorine that was used, lots of water will clear it. Your apparent admiration for Assad’s regime is typical of those who hate this country and our allies in the free world.

 

[Homar]

Yes it’s “peddled” by the western media because this country and others like it has a free press that generally tends to investigate the facts rather than repeat government propaganda like RT, SANA, Press TV and Fox News.

The inspectors will examine the people that the Syrian regime allows them to examine and speak to the doctors that know what will happen if they don’t toe the regime line. There’s plenty of stories in the press already about doctors being intimidated. And if it’s chlorine that was used, lots of water will clear it. Your apparent admiration for Assad’s regime is typical of those who hate this country and our allies in the free world.

The media have regurgitated the government's line word-for-word, exactly as they did in the buildup to the Iraq war and exactly as you have done here. That is not the hallmark of a free press. It is exactly the opposite. The "free press" has not presented any evidence to provide credence to their collective theory. You seem to take the OPCW inspectors for fools. You have already dismissed the findings of any investigation before it has commenced. I'm sure that you will accept it if they find the Syrian government culpable... So you accept the claims of western governments, despite the fact that they have presented no evidence, despite the fact that they have a history for failed intelligence on this very subject and despite the fact that the OPCW has yet to present any findings. They must love you.

I have not expressed any admiration for Assad. I have simply stated that I consider certain western governments to be far more morally degenerate than the Syrian government, which is fighting foreign terrorist groups partly supported by western governments and their allies. I reject outright the ridiculous assertions that western governments operate to a higher ethical code. And I have provided a non-exhaustive list of documented cases proving this point.

 

[Homar]

And on the subject of the BBC, I ask simply the following: Does an organisation belonging to a free and impartial press agree to provide the signal to commence an MI6/CIA orchestrated coup against a democratically elected president?

 

[west didsblue]

The media have regurgitated the government's line word-for-word, exactly as they did in the buildup to the Iraq war and exactly as you have done here. That is not the hallmark of a free press. It is exactly the opposite. The "free press" has not presented any evidence to provide credence to their collective theory. You seem to take the OPCW inspectors for fools. You have already dismissed the findings of any investigation before it has commenced. I'm sure that you will accept it if they find the Syrian government culpable... So you accept the claims of western governments, despite the fact that they have presented no evidence, despite the fact that they have a history for failed intelligence on this very subject and despite the fact that the OPCW has yet to present any findings. They must love you.

I have not expressed any admiration for Assad. I have simply stated that I consider certain western governments to be far more morally degenerate than the Syrian government, which is fighting foreign terrorist groups partly supported by western governments and their allies. I reject outright the ridiculous assertions that western governments operate to a higher ethical code. And I have provided a non-exhaustive list of documented cases proving this point.

Your indoctrination is too ingrained to bother with you.

 

[The blue phantom]

Any time Isreal gets criticised, it’s seemingly anti Semitic. I suppose criticising Israeli soldiers using live rounds on unarmed protesters, or using them as live target practice , videoing it, showing it to their mates and bragging about it, I suppose criticising that is anti Semitic too?

I've no idea why his post was labelled Anti semetic. I don't agree with most he says but he never abuses anyone and puts his case forward.

 

[Homar]

You don’t know much about chlorine gas do you.

As graduated Chemical Engineer, I'd like to think that I did know a thing or two. And I certainly know that chlorine is dissolvable in water, concrete is permeable to water and that a vapour liquid equilibrium ensures that the gas would not fully evaporate. Secondly, the blood samples of those supposedly exposed would probably indicate whether they were indeed exposed. Thirdly, the claims of western governments are that the attacks also involved a nerve agent.

But, having been briefed by the expert analysis of an impartial free press, I guess that you must now know more than the OPCW inspectors, who clearly believe it is worth their time to carry out an investigation...

 

[Homar]

Your indoctrination is too ingrained to bother with you.

On the contrary, it is you that has been indoctrinated, as evidenced by your paraphrasing of the government's line. Your failure to address any of my points is noted but hardly surprising.