You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Riyad Mahrez
- Thread starter Otamendi's Beard
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Signing Mahrez will not improve our first team in the slightest ? Nothing to be said really ....time will tell.
How will it improve our first team ?
Is he better than Sterling or Sane ?
The answer is no he is not, he can improve our rotational ability, but again I will say 75m for rotational players lol
So is there really any need for this kind of comment "nothing to be said really" sorry to disagree with you but there you go.
Bpughh
Well-Known Member
Mahrez is somewhere in between. He's not a sinclair but he's not a hazard. We'll see how he does...But we wanted Hazard, Van Persie and De Rossi.
We could play the 3 of them ,he could play as a roaming midfielder because his passing and movement is v.good also. A very classy player who is better than B.Silva & Sane right now & would be straight in the 1st team. I think once he’s played for us for a few months you will change your view of him .How will it improve our first team ?
Is he better than Sterling or Sane ?
The answer is no he is not, he can improve our rotational ability, but again I will say 75m for rotational players lol
So is there really any need for this kind of comment "nothing to be said really" sorry to disagree with you but there you go.
wagonman
Well-Known Member
How will it improve our first team ?
Is he better than Sterling or Sane ?
The answer is no he is not, he can improve our rotational ability, but again I will say 75m for rotational players lol
So is there really any need for this kind of comment "nothing to be said really" sorry to disagree with you but there you go.
Please can you help me out here, Mr Bluealf.
You don't think Mahrez will improve our first team.
Pep Guardiola seems to think he will.
Whom do you think I should believe?
JJ
Franknorgrovesnephew
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 4,930
the guy is fucked already if he signs with you miserable fuckers .
Disagree. He's a great legendary player and therefore he'll have no issues hearing (if he does at all) any assessment (fair, or exaggerated in either direction) of him.the guy is fucked already if he signs with you miserable fuckers .
Please can you help me out here, Mr Bluealf.
You don't think Mahrez will improve our first team.
Pep Guardiola seems to think he will.
Whom do you think I should believe?
JJ
He's entitled to his opinion and time will tell.
I think people find it hard to appreciate how far we have come this season and how good we actually are.
Is he better than Sane and Sterling is certainly debateable and the fact we can have a genuine debate on that shows there is quality there and there is not many in the PL we can be talking about.
We need a player in that position, to have someone who is beyond debate better then Sane or Sterling there is probably a handful, are any available, within our wage structure, transfer budget, would they be happy with rotation etc.
So I would want to know who Bluealf think we should buy.
My actual issue is he very rarely plays on the Left, Sterling is half the player out there and I don't think B. Silva has played there. I think we would have more balance with someone who was stronger on left, but could play right as opposed to the other way. With Sane out we may find having to go 5 at the back with wing backs as our default position.
That said I am happy with it, the money is a lot but probably market price in this inflated market. We will probably get told how can a 75 million player be on the bench, but in Sane and Sterling you probably have £100 million player.
Mahrez is somewhere in between. He's not a sinclair but he's not a hazard. We'll see how he does...
How is he not a hazard? He's out performed him over the last three seasons despite playing in a worse team.
The only difference is Hazard sells more shirts. Ability wise there's nothing in it.
urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 35,092
Mahrez is somewhere in between. He's not a sinclair but he's not a hazard. We'll see how he does...
Mahrez asked to leave sulked for a week and came back and put in a shift for Leicester
That lazy cheating diving **** hazard takes every other season off if and then only performs if he can be arsed.
If I had a choice I would take Mahrez tbh
Rhapsody in Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 2,671
- Team supported
- Manchester City
If Mahrez signed for Pool I suppose everyone would start flapping. Amazing signing that makes our squad (not starting eleven as there is no such thing) much stronger.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,698
Mahrez is somewhere in between. He's not a sinclair but he's not a hazard. We'll see how he does...
His stats,and what i have seen with my own eyes,suggest he's very close to 'a Hazard' and his name shouldn't be mentioned in the same footballing universe as 'a Sinclair'
Matt the Giant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Dec 2009
- Messages
- 6,227
His stats,and what i have seen with my own eyes,suggest he's very close to 'a Hazard' and his name shouldn't be mentioned in the same footballing universe as 'a Sinclair'
Amen.
Would 100% have Mahrez over Hazard. If you put Hazard into the Leicester team, I don`t think he would be as good as Mahrez.Mahrez is somewhere in between. He's not a sinclair but he's not a hazard. We'll see how he does...
32 goals and 13 assists (only PL) in the last 3 seasons for Hazard
35 goals and 25 assists (only PL) in the last 3 seasons for Mahrez
I think Mahrez would be fantastic here, and I`m curious if he can play on the left side as we don`t have too many alternatives to Sane
abu13
Well-Known Member
This deal has grown on me and for one I believe he will make a supurb addition to the squad. One thing is for sure he wont be here to sit on the bench. He will have to earn his starting pot but once there he will take some shifting.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,236
- Team supported
- Manchester City
How will it improve our first team ?
Is he better than Sterling or Sane ?
The answer is no he is not, he can improve our rotational ability, but again I will say 75m for rotational players lol
So is there really any need for this kind of comment "nothing to be said really" sorry to disagree with you but there you go.
Well be sure to come back when it goes tits up and tell Pep that he knows fuck all.
Please can you help me out here, Mr Bluealf.
You don't think Mahrez will improve our first team.
Pep Guardiola seems to think he will.
Whom do you think I should believe?
JJ
Are we not allowed an opinion ?
Can you think for yourself with out falling back on the "pep thinks" line it is pathetic, Pep also fucking spunked 17m on Bravo deal with that conundrum.
Also you didn't answer the question, but obviously you must think he is better than Sterling or Sane, I think that is wrong obviously.
PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
Are we not allowed an opinion ?
Can you think for yourself with out falling back on the "pep thinks" line it is pathetic, Pep also fucking spunked 17m on Bravo deal with that conundrum.
Also you didn't answer the question, but obviously you must think he is better than Sterling or Sane, I think that is wrong obviously.
Not better, not worse. Different.
He doesn't have the pace of Sane and Sterling but more skilful on the ball and a very good passer and finisher.
Well be sure to come back when it goes tits up and tell Pep that he knows fuck all.
What is the matter with people on here, do we have to log in and go baa baa baa, Pep thinks, Pep says, it must be true, Pep never makes an error.
What a pathetic argument you have come back with.
Do remember I fucking stated he was a good player, I never rubbished him, just said he won't improve our first team, sorry for the independent thinking that he isn't a patch on Sterling or Sane, what am I fucking like eh.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.