Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Good old Durham
Drop Salah?
Which is worse. Burnley Huddersfield or United v toon
Ha ha!
Drop Salah?
Which is worse. Burnley Huddersfield or United v toon
Ha ha!
Have you not noticed the bad press the club gets tends to be aimed at the managers and their individual shortcomings? We’ve seen it with Mourinho, LVG and Moyes in recent years when the cracks have appeared. I hardly see or hear much about the deeper rooted problems at the swamp. For me that’s where the real story is. There was something posted today written by David Conn which spoke of the non managerial problems which made for good reading.You must listen to a different talkSPORT then mate, because all it is on that show this week is a full on lambasting of mourinho in particular, their players and Bruce has copped from it from one of their own presenters. For a blue the last couple of weeks where united are concerned have been very pleasant listening.
Silly Cow this morning ;-
"You can't really count the 5-0 because Liverpool were down to ten men"
"City are missing one of their main men in De Bruyne, but so are Liverpool because Salah isn't playing well"
Silly Cow this morning ;-
"You can't really count the 5-0 because Liverpool were down to ten men"
"City are missing one of their main men in De Bruyne, but so are Liverpool because Salah isn't playing well"
the game at home when liverpool was down to 10 was not why we won 5.0 we lost our keeper and bravo was still on rocky ground, but we played really well after a slow start and liverpool pressed us early and was blowing after 20 mins and that is liverpool and klopps game plans, press and score early and hold on and even the league game at liverpool aguero had the chance to level the game in injury time, and we all know the champions league we was done over by liverpool and uefa and 2 or 3 major things in the 2 legs change the result of the tie
I’ve said all along that the game at Etihad last September was pretty even until Sergio scored.
After that, we started to control it and the incident, in which Mané nearly decapitated Eddie was against the run of play.
All the bollocks that has been spouted since about the sending-off changing the game is just that: BOLLOCKS.
Great logic.Silly Cow this morning ;-
"You can't really count the 5-0 because Liverpool were down to ten men"
"City are missing one of their main men in De Bruyne, but so are Liverpool because Salah isn't playing well"
Scouse logic.
If one of your players makes a stupid tackle like Mane , then you deserve what you get , a 5-0 humiliation
Bound to go with pep lost the dressing room coz mahrez put it over the bar and gabby wants a transfer.Will Durham go for easy bait today with something along the lines of "Whatever happened to Liverpool's world's greatest front 3? Pep played mind games and found them out. Are Liverpool now a busted flush?"
You can have that one for free if your lurking Adrian.
Just had a ref on and they believe Kun should’ve had a penalty!
I can remember most people saying that, despite removing Edison's face from his head, the sending off was a poor decision and Mane wasn't really like that.That cannot be classed as a tackle
It was head height studs up dangerous play
That cannot be classed as a tackle
It was head height studs up dangerous play
Stevie Wonder wants some help. Can you get him a pilot's licence?Wrong...Jurgen said his feet were in a perfectly plausible position and anyway, Mane wasn't looking so couldn't have seen, heard or expected a 6' 5" giant in green coming towards him. Plus, Ederson ducked into it.
The defence rests m'lud
Wrong...Jurgen said his feet were in a perfectly plausible position and anyway, Mane wasn't looking so couldn't have seen, heard or expected a 6' 5" giant in green coming towards him. Plus, Ederson ducked into it.
The defence rests m'lud