BimboBob
Well-Known Member
I've had this very argument about 6 or 7 times here. So I don't want to reharsh it. But Everytime it comes up, my general view is that the person I'm arguing against doesn't really believe what tgey claim. They've just said it for so long now that they've come to believe it.
So as a change, I'd grant that there are some who may in fact 'see more' at the game. I can't tell how this is possible, but hey, maybe depth perception isn't an issue for some or perhaps they have Eagle vision and can see the intricacies of closeup action from a distance. Who knows.
But for me, The stadium is where I go for the atmosphere, but if I want a better view, I grab your remote and click.
So you are calling me a liar?
I'll try and explain it to you. The TV camera follows the ball. If you sit in level 3 you get a really good view. Nearly, but not quite, match of the day view. It enables you to follow a player if you wish for the whole game. TV wont let you do this. As such you get to see the players off the ball, away from the action. Their little runs. Their sprints. Their positioning. If you are saying that you get all that from watching TV then well done. You don't. You only watch what the TV companies follow.
Do you get it now?
https://3ddigitalvenue.com/3dmap/clients/manchester-city/
Pick 305. Then halfway down. See the view. Lovely isn't it.