FA Cup 4/5/6/7 Jan

[Gray]

To Neville Kneville and Alan Harper's Tash - isn't this just what makes life so interesting, the fact that everybody can see things differently from everybody else.

Keep up the good work chaps.

 

[platty7]

ashley young must have made 10 fouls at least so far and still no card

 

[Neville Kneville]

If Reading had been able to loan Aguero for a week, they would be about 7 goals up in this game.

This is going to go so hilariously pear shaped in the near future.

 

[Neville Kneville]

To Neville Kneville and Alan Harper's Tash - isn't this just what makes life so interesting, the fact that everybody can see things differently from everybody else.

Keep up the good work chaps.

Indeed.

But it's caused him to sulk for some reason.

 

[cookster]

Reading 62%, the Rags are laughable.

 

[hertsblue]

Hour played. 61 percent possession and 10 shots to 6 for Reading, who last won on 3rd Nov. Utd needing var help and usual opposition miss chances galore to be winning but guess it will be a brilliant achievement of 5 wins in a row

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

ashley young must have made 10 fouls at least so far and still no card

Special FA Cup dispensation for the OGS rag army - doesn't count below 20

 

[Neville Kneville]

Definitely. One of us will wait to see what impact VAR has next season. The other has already formed their opinion of how it will play out and decided it's skewed against us already.

Which is the closed minded approach?

You.

You're being snidey rather than talking football.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

You.

You're being snidey rather than talking football.

Don't really understand? Snidey? You've made your mind up on VAR when it hasn't even been introduced yet bar a few cup games.

Sulking? Nah, just don't agree with your preconceived ideas of what will happen, however you try to phrase your opinion (not fact).

 

[hertsblue]

Special FA Cup dispensation for the OGS rag army - doesn't count below 20

He only gets yellows if he commits a red card offense. Gets away with stuff every week

 

[Neville Kneville]

Don't really understand? Snidey? You've made your mind up on VAR when it hasn't even been introduced yet bar a few cup games.

Sulking? Nah, just don't agree with your preconceived ideas of what will happen, however you try to phrase your opinion (not fact).

'Lost the will to live'

'Agenda' 'Obsession' 'closed minded'.

It was you who questioned me, in the first place.

I will give you 100 examples of where v.a.r. is open to interpretation. We have just seen.one.

You appear have faith that refs will be consistent in that interpretation

I see no evidence in the history of football, to back that opinion. I've seen nothing in the application of v.a.r. which brings me any doubt that I might be even slightly wrong.

That's not 'closed minded' it's pure logic based on evidence.

 

[mat]

Turned it on for 30 seconds. Saw the winner of the play for the rags competition get a yellow then switched off.

 

[jimharri]

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

'Lost the will to live'

'Agenda' 'Obsession' 'closed minded'.

It was you who questioned me, in the first place.

I will give you 100 examples of where v.a.r. is open to interpretation. We have just seen.one.

You appear have faith that refs will be consistent in that interpretation

I see no evidence in the history of football, to back that opinion. I've seen nothing in the apication of v.a.r. which brings me any doubt that I might be even slightly wrong.

That's not 'closed minded' it's pure logic based on evidence.

Ultimately, VAR is system where another referee is able to add their interpretation to the incident given the benefit of time and different angles and replays. This isn't going to iradicate "incorrect" decisions as human interpretation is subjective.

Therefore, VAR is ultimately going to overrule the blatant errors and will still cause debating points on the decisions that are less clear cut. (Like the penalty we discussed earlier).

The agenda I suggested you have is that you have already decided that it will benefit Liverpool and the rags more than anyone else, without foundation.

 

[zandvoort blue]

 

[mat]

Ultimately, VAR is system where another referee is able to add their interpretation to the incident given the benefit of time and different angles and replays. This isn't going to iradicate "incorrect" decisions as human interpretation is subjective.

Therefore, VAR is ultimately going to overrule the blatant errors and will still cause debating points on the decisions that are less clear cut. (Like the penalty we discussed earlier).

The agenda I suggested you have is that you have already decided that it will benefit Liverpool and the rags more than anyone else, without foundation.

Seems evident today. Looking at a play where a rag fell over for no reason.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Seems evident today. Looking at a play where a rag fell over for no reason.

I thought it was a blatant penalty.

 

[Newman Noggs]

'Lost the will to live'

'Agenda' 'Obsession' 'closed minded'.

It was you who questioned me, in the first place.

I will give you 100 examples of where v.a.r. is open to interpretation. We have just seen.one.

You appear have faith that refs will be consistent in that interpretation

I see no evidence in the history of football, to back that opinion. I've seen nothing in the application of v.a.r. which brings me any doubt that I might be even slightly wrong.

That's not 'closed minded' it's pure logic based on evidence.

And you are right.

 

[blue by birth]

Lol. I'll leave you to your closed mind and agenda driven obsession against VAR.

My observation on the incident ...the referee (twatwell) didn't make the decision...it was made by the person reviewing the incident on var.
The ref should have gone over to where he could see it for his self and made the decision.
Whether the decision is correct or incorrect it seems wrong that somebody else made the decision rather than advising the ref to look at a screen and view it for himself.

 

[Neville Kneville]

Ultimately, VAR is system where another referee is able to add their interpretation to the incident given the benefit of time and different angles and replays. This isn't going to iradicate "incorrect" decisions as human interpretation is subjective.

Therefore, VAR is ultimately going to overrule the blatant errors and will still cause debating points on the decisions that are less clear cut. (Like the penalty we discussed earlier).

The agenda I suggested you have is that you have already decided that it will benefit Liverpool and the rags more than anyone else, without foundation.

It will benefit the same teams.

There will be some decisions they won't get, which they normally would, which will be balanced out by them getting other decisions they wouldn't get right now, which they will get from v.a.r..

They just got one.