Are Labour a total shambles now as an opposition?

Bigga said:
Has any Prime Minister shook hands with a terrorist advocate/ dictator/ all round douche?

I guess not...


image.jpg


ShowImage.ashx


hands_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqgDfw5CGmXni5KDZsPfD2vs0yScU8-6iNxbF_PZpLvPc.jpg


Good grief, how did that get here...??
Click to expand...
Do you think that because we criticise Corbyn, it should be taken as axiomatic that we must be fanboys of the Saudis, Israelis and trump???
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bigga said:
Ask yourself, would he still be the pariah if he'd have been covered with a clean slate instead having to carry the weight of stigmatisation from the UK press? A view that's tainted minds like yourselves rather than the ideas he has for the UK?

We'll never know, will we..?
Click to expand...

He got the press onside early, hence his ability in the political arena.

Corbyn is naive, old fashioned and incapable.
 
ganganvince said:
Thing is he wasn't Prime minister with obligations he was a very unimportant back bencher who could follow his beliefs. And just to put the peace talks to bed he had no authorised part. Couple of years old but says a lot.

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/...silence-over-warrington-bombing-35646993.html
Click to expand...

The piece is completely sh*t when based in the fact that Corbyn won't condemn the IRA... in particular.

It's how the media do it. They pressurise you into making a statement of identification and then they hammer you with it or use it to smash down the door of another situation to be specific about. He never gave them those avenues before.

He was smart then, just roundly condemning all acts of war, including those from these shores.

"One man's terrorist..." and all that, in my opinion.

At the moment, being forced into making a statement about 'something' is the same trap he was so good at avoiding, is his downfall.

But, as I said before, you guys churn out the SAME talking points, leaving out the whole context, in order to feed your 'argument'.

I would say it's 'shocking', but that would be a bold faced lie...
 
oldtimerdiscopants said:
I don't need to make up my mind, myself and millions like me will do as we please. I'll not vote for a group of people who obviously care nothing for the working classes, Labour is a middle class and any minority party now and it's dead in the water and the polls are showing it.
Click to expand...
Are you referring to Brexit by saying that? And can you define middle class and working class for me?
 
Bigga said:
The piece is completely sh*t when based in the fact that Corbyn won't condemn the IRA... in particular.

It's how the media do it. They pressurise you into making a statement of identification and then they hammer you with it or use it to smash down the door of another situation to be specific about. He never gave them those avenues before.

He was smart then, just roundly condemning all acts of war, including those from these shores.

"One man's terrorist..." and all that, in my opinion.

At the moment, being forced into making a statement about 'something' is the same trap he was so good at avoiding, is his downfall.

But, as I said before, you guys churn out the SAME talking points, leaving out the whole context, in order to feed your 'argument'.

I would say it's 'shocking', but that would be a bold faced lie...
Click to expand...
Probably best to end conversation there
 
Fiona Onasanya banged up for 3 months. Speeding and texting then perverting the course of justice, she got off lightly imo. Still not resigned as MP for Peterborough though! Shameless fucker.
 
Djibrilshairdo said:
Fiona Onasanya banged up for 3 months. Speeding and texting then perverting the course of justice, she got off lightly imo. Still not resigned as MP for Peterborough though! Shameless fucker.
Click to expand...

And ws expelled from labour once found guilty.
In fact they asked her to resign her seat which she refused.
 
happyman said:
This is true she plans to carry on as an independent. Will she be eligible for a pension if she carries on?
Click to expand...

Of course she will. However a more pertinent question is who is representing her constituents while she is banged up! Imagine No Deal brexit going through by one vote while she is locked up and can't vote.

Shocking state of affairs!
 
Gaudion M said:
Of course she will. However a more pertinent question is who is representing her constituents while she is banged up! Imagine No Deal brexit going through by one vote while she is locked up and can't vote.

Shocking state of affairs!
Click to expand...

A very good question and one I can't answer, do they have stand ins?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top