jimharri
Moderator
I remember that. The Bay City Rollers, yeah?...Bye bye football
I remember that. The Bay City Rollers, yeah?...Bye bye football
And that’s exactly how it should be and should have been from the start, ‘prioritise controls over clubs that don’t pay the salary of players or club employees’From a summary a french user did, the change is due to the recent rulings in favour of Milan AC, Galatasaray, PSG by TAS.
There are several reactions and talks at UEFA and some members are saying it will become less and less possible to use FFP in its current form and even risky to go into trials against those rich clubs (contrary to the small clubs that can't fight against FFP and can be forced to comply).
They are unanimous about Manchester City, since Football Leaks revelations, with a supposed financial system based on image rights that allow them to circumvent FFP and an investigation has been launched. City, on the other hand, is waiting for the results of that investigation and is using the fact that those documents have been illegally obtained through massive hack of private informations as their defence.
Ceferin doesn't want to make any comment but keeps repeating that FFP initial goal has been met, since european football has become a lot healthier with introduction of FFP in 2011 with 600 M benefices now from 1.7 billion accumulated losses before.
UEFA knows they could face a lot of complicated legal procedures in the future, so they think about simplifying some rules without ditching the whole FFP concept.
Among those rules, the instances wouldn't seek to control the origin of the money or how it is spent but will only verify if clubs finances stay in the green side.
For example, they would prioritize controls over clubs that don't pay the salary of players or club employees.
However, whatever route UEFA chose to follow in the future, PSG and Manchester City are still the targets now, especially PSG that enter the period where they need to justify Neymar and Mbappé acquisition in their books.
I think it is exactly why they will/could change the rules in the future but not now.If they no longer plan to seek the origin of the money, then City and PSG can never be targeted again.
All bets are off because they can pump in whatever cash they like.
Both clubs are and always will be in the green.
Personally, it's a crock of shit.
The new European format is a cartel of clubs and with the huge TV money on offer, neither City of Paris will have the type of financial advantage previously held if Barca, United and Real can also offer similar wages.
I suspect the first £1m a week footballer will be seen during the next five years.
I think it is exactly why they will/could change the rules in the future but not now.
They need to shackle us/stall until the new format in 2024 is delivered. Real Madrid is supposed to get 900 M/year. The other clubs would receive a lot of money as well but Real Madrid would get the highest.
So, at this time, as you pointed out, our financial might would not be exceptional anymore.
No relegation for R.Madrid or Barca?
HAHA.
If they no longer plan to seek the origin of the money, then City and PSG can never be targeted again.
All bets are off because they can pump in whatever cash they like.
Both clubs are and always will be in the green.
Personally, it's a crock of shit.
The new European format is a cartel of clubs and with the huge TV money on offer, neither City of Paris will have the type of financial advantage previously held if Barca, United and Real can also offer similar wages.
I suspect the first £1m a week footballer will be seen during the next five years.
I dislike mix-week matches because I have to rely on the "Gods Awful" Metrolink to get to the stadium.Takes place in week-ends with national leagues in mid-week.