Harry Maguire

[razman]

I like Harry, but I won't pay 99 million for him. Frankly, I won't pay 99 million for any defender period!

Sam Lee in article today mentions 60m

 

[Dax777]

Sam Lee in article today mentions 60m

That's seems in line with what we generally pay for defenders. I think it's excessive, but we've become accustomed to doing it. :(

 

[GX Blue]

We all know we are definitely signing Maguire.
It is what it is.
Hes good in the air and we do lack that so all in all lets just embrace this.

 

[Nails]

There's no way de Ligt is coming here - City will not deal with Raiola. Maguire is a very good second choice.

 

[Maine Road]

Harry Meguire is definitely a good player.
But his value can never be 90m.
If City wants him, his price should be less than £50m.

 

[Nails]

I've watched him numerous times for both England and Leicester and I'm not going to be sucked into hyping him just because we're linked.

We are a club aspiring to win the CL and Harry Maguire doesn't take us to that level.

Well then, I must question your cognitive development, as he's far from slow. He ain't the second coming but he's a very good CH.

 

[northwichblue]

Time for Harry to put a transfer request in

 

[mosssideblue]

Harry Meguire is definitely a good player.
But his value can never be 90m.
If City wants him, his price should be less than £50m.

What's your next move if we want him and Leicester tell us to do one with £50m?

 

[Cobra]

What's your next move if we want him and Leicester tell us to do one with £50m?

Offer them £51 million and Mangala?!

 

[northwichblue]

£50m+ the mangala

 

[markbmcfc]

£60m or £80m + Mangala should do it.

 

[Cobra]

£60 million plus Roberts wouldn’t be the worst deal. Roberts played his best football under Rogers so you’d assume he’d be up for a move there.

 

[Ballymagash Blue]

£60m or £80m + Mangala should do it.

Unfortunately, that's not a joke!

 

[meeesh]

£45m plus Roberts and Mangala

 

[Radcliffe 1309]

Please City do not buy Maguire......not good enough for me

 

[blue by birth]

Maguire isn't a player I've really taken much notice of, apart from playing against us and when he plays for England so I can't honestly say if he's what we need.
If Pep thinks he's what we need then I will go with Peps opinion...as long as it's not JFE or Phil the Face.
Same with MDL, I've only really seen him a few times on TV, but I was impressed by him.
Hopefully we get our transfer targets in early and up too speed for pre season .

 

[flb]

Harry Meguire is definitely a good player.
But his value can never be 90m.
If City wants him, his price should be less than £50m.

It will never be less than £50m fella

We are in VVD territory regardless of whether hes worth it-if we sign him then time will tell if hes up there.

 

[grifter]

He can’t replace a prime Vinnie but he can definitely do the job VK has done under Pep these last few years. We’ll get done on the fee but I don’t care he seems a great character and I think he’s a player who will go from strength to strength in a top team like ours.

 

[blueparrot]

Please City do not buy Maguire......not good enough for me

But he might be good enough for Pep so I'll just wait and see what happens.

 

[nmc]

There has to be a CB across Europe who represents better value than Maguire. I'm not in the don’t rate Maguire camp but I think anything north of £50m is a joke. Leicester look like getting more for Maguire than we can muster for Sane.