UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah fair enough and once he apologised he was back in the team!

Sane situation is totally different! Sane has done nothing wrong apart from not signing his contract. A threat of making him sit in the stands for 2 years what will that actually do? Its difficult situation for the club, sell him for less than his market value is worth? Carry on as we are doing now then he leaves for nowt? Threat of not playing him for next 2 years?

Personally if its true that his family are in on it with Bayern Id get as much as we can this summer for him and seeing he only want bayern it negotiating and getting as near as possible to the 100m we can! Probably end up with 70m+ add ons up to 85m for him.

I will be very surprised if we deal at anything less than 100m euros and a 15 per cent sell-on.

We should be citing Dortmund sale of Dembele to Barca.
 
The incumbent head of UEFA, Alexander Ceferin, stated in December that there was 'a concrete case' against Manchester City, and that they will 'come down hard on them, if found guilty by the AC'.

That being more than 6 months ago, why the delay?

I'm presuming that with the notice City sent to CAS, the UEFA mob have decided that they had better look at all of the documents before proceeding with the lynching.
I think he said that they were going to build a concrete case. I took this to mean" an end to all the name calling, let us see if we can build a concrete case"
 
I will be very surprised if we deal at anything less than 100m euros and a 15 per cent sell-on.

We should be citing Dortmund sale of Dembele to Barca.


Agree but unless Bayern are absolutely desperate for him this season Sane holds the cards! 100m would be fair I’ll be shocked if we get that much though.
 
It's almost like they(the cartel) are setting out to damage the club commercially, whilst also trying to unsettle our manager and players... and they talk about cheating and dirty tactics all the time, quite ironic.

We should be getting £130m+ if he goes. I'd rather we spell out that we don't want to deal with Bayern because of their tactics even if they do stump up the cash, seeing him go to Barca or PSG or anywhere else would send a message to them.

If Mbappé does want to leave PSG for Real, PSG could well meet any evaluation we have. It's obvious to anyone he is a potential future Balon D'or contender.
 
Last edited:
CAS haven't said anything.

Any c unt can say it was a UEFA spokesman nobody specific so yeah it is a no source comment, just the generic UEFA spokesaman which actually is just spurious shite

If you read it it clearly says a "UEFA spokesman", so it's not a no source comment. Its nothing the club, UEFA or CAS wouldn't have been aware of.
Any c unt can say it was a UEFA spokesman nobody specific so yeah it is a no proper source comment just the generic UEFA spokesman which is actually just spurious shite.
 
It's almost like they(the cartel) are setting out to damage the club commercially, whilst also trying to unsettle our manager and players... and they talk about cheating and dirty tactics all the time, quite ironic.

We should be getting £130m - £160m if he goes. I'd rather we spell out that we don't want to deal with Bayern because of their tactics even if they do stump up the cash, seeing him go to Barca or PSG or anywhere else would send a message to them.

if sane does go or wants out then it must never be to munich unless they pay top dollars and my start price would be £200million because sane is that good and could win them champions league and shit loads of league titles at munich and also at somebody else ??? i don't think pep want to sell him and he is still very young and lots of time to grab a shirt of his own at city

but munich are taking the piss and all the moaning they have done about our owners money and not manchester city football clubs own revenue well do one, and even if the player sane want to go home it will not be to you unless you pay double want the asking price i would even loan him to Dortmund before selling to munich
 
if sane does go or wants out then it must never be to munich unless they pay top dollars and my start price would be £200million because sane is that good and could win them champions league and shit loads of league titles at munich and also at somebody else ??? i don't think pep want to sell him and he is still very young and lots of time to grab a shirt of his own at city

but munich are taking the piss and all the moaning they have done about our owners money and not manchester city football clubs own revenue well do one, and even if the player sane want to go home it will not be to you unless you pay double want the asking price i would even loan him to Dortmund before selling to munich
It's going to be a long summer isn't it?

The press are giving the whole club, the fans, the owner, the full Sterling treatment and the cartel are loving it.
 
Airlines you say? Some are ok, just not Etihad.
Emirates are in Dubai their human rights record whilst subject to the laws of uae are fucking impeccable hence associated to such traditional clubs like arsenal and Madrid, etihad are just dirty little upstarts from Abu Dhabi and every penny they sponsor in football, f1, baseball etc is dirty oil money! Er ok just the money used in sponsorship of any CFg club is dirty the rest is encouraged and applauded as clean oil money.
 
Josep Maria Bartomeu: "It is not fair that other clubs use resources that do not come from football. Both UEFA and FIFA must demand compliance with the rules. Equitable conditions must be guaranteed and financial fair play compliance must be accelerated, especially for Manchester City and PSG."
So what role does he have and when did he make this statement- just playing catch-up
 
Emirates are in Dubai their human rights record whilst subject to the laws of uae are fucking impeccable hence associated to such traditional clubs like arsenal and Madrid, etihad are just dirty little upstarts from Abu Dhabi and every penny they sponsor in football, f1, baseball etc is dirty oil money! Er ok just the money used in sponsorship of any CFg club is dirty the rest is encouraged and applauded as clean oil money.
So to summarize the geography of the UAE can be split between
A. Abu Dhabi where all the human rights abusing slave traders come from and
B. Dubai where the nice people who bankrolled the 'sport of kings' are from and where ex-pro's on the punditry gravy train get their winter sun ?
 
So to summarize the geography of the UAE can be split between
A. Abu Dhabi where all the human rights abusing slave traders come from and
B. Dubai where the nice people who bankrolled the 'sport of kings' are from and where ex-pro's on the punditry gravy train get their winter sun ?
AND City are dirty cheats and the entire G16 are angels.
 
If what tolmie has got wind of about Leroy's father and potentially giving the German rags info I would be shipping Leroy out at an alarming rate without giving him a thanks kiss my arse or out..starting to take a dislike to the lad at an alarming rate
 
AND City are dirty cheats and the entire G16 are angels.
Real Madrid have already spent 300m so far yet their TV income is less than half of ours this season and their sponsorship deals heavily geared to success which has been missing this season. I will bet anybody that their not under and threat of FFP by UEFA, they approved funding a few years back when they were allowed to sell their training ground and surrounding land for 3 times its value to the Spanish government and then lease it back for next to nothing ! This is the corrupt allegiance that the former G16 clubs have with UEFA such hypocrisy is laughable if it wasn't so disgraceful!
 
So to summarize the geography of the UAE can be split between
A. Abu Dhabi where all the human rights abusing slave traders come from and
B. Dubai where the nice people who bankrolled the 'sport of kings' are from and where ex-pro's on the punditry gravy train get their winter sun ?
And the other states are totally irrelevant unless they buy say West Brom and knock arsenal into 7th in 2021
 
Trying to work out which thread I’m in, not sure if it's Sane thread or FFP but on the Sane part of this thread I thought his parents (or at least his mum) were his agents so I would not be too surprised if they are encouraging this move to Bayern as any agent probably would.
 
Real spending aint that bad if they got these 5 players for 5 year contract thats its only an extra 50m expense this season for the transfer fees.
They also sold CR last season for a great fee they made nice profit on his amortisation fee which at that points must have been low having been there for 9 seasons.

Salaries could be an issue but again letting CR go last season alone covers probably Mendy, Militao, Jovic and Rodrigo salary alltogether. While Hazard's salary will be offset with selling james Rodriguez and finally offload Bale and soon they will replace Modric too and they still plan t sell 3-4 other players from the squad or the ones out on loan.

Thed did spend big but its imo not something that would cause them any real FFP problems as long as they get rid of the players they dont need like Bale. And they mae their squad much younger building for the future.

Imagine if we got Kun in 2011 for 35m and now this summer a bid would come in for him for 150m pounds. That would be probably 150m profit straight on our accounts.

You now the cost of one player on 5 year contract if its a high profile player lets say 100m fee and 300kk salary per week plus 10m agent fee. Its 45m pound in first year and 35m each next 4 years.

Simply the Nike-Puma change lets us buy a 100m player every summer while Puma is with us with no negative effect on our accounts.

And Real Madird has higher incomes, better sponsors than we do, also make much more in gate income. No way they can have ffp problems.

I am sure all these attacks on our club is also a plan for them to try to keep away big sponsors away from City painting us in a bad way, like cheaters etc. they dont want sponsors like Nissan and Puma with us. They cant attack those directly only they can attack the arabic ones.

If I would be Mansour I would try to influence some of these big companies in the world with no direct ties to UAE to repace Etihad as our shirt and stadium spinsor for a mindblowing fee.

Someone like Google or Apple to come in and bankroll us a nice spinsorship deal. Would the media dare to attack those like they do with Arabic sponsors?
Imagine the face of Castles, Harris on twitter to read the news of Apple replacing Etihad and its called Apple Stadium for next 10 years for 100m per season.
 
Real spending aint that bad if they got these 5 players for 5 year contract thats its only an extra 50m expense this season for the transfer fees.
They also sold CR last season for a great fee they made nice profit on his amortisation fee which at that points must have been low having been there for 9 seasons.

Salaries could be an issue but again letting CR go last season alone covers probably Mendy, Militao, Jovic and Rodrigo salary alltogether. While Hazard's salary will be offset with selling james Rodriguez and finally offload Bale and soon they will replace Modric too and they still plan t sell 3-4 other players from the squad or the ones out on loan.

Thed did spend big but its imo not something that would cause them any real FFP problems as long as they get rid of the players they dont need like Bale. And they mae their squad much younger building for the future.

Imagine if we got Kun in 2011 for 35m and now this summer a bid would come in for him for 150m pounds. That would be probably 150m profit straight on our accounts.

You now the cost of one player on 5 year contract if its a high profile player lets say 100m fee and 300kk salary per week plus 10m agent fee. Its 45m pound in first year and 35m each next 4 years.

Simply the Nike-Puma change lets us buy a 100m player every summer while Puma is with us with no negative effect on our accounts.

And Real Madird has higher incomes, better sponsors than we do, also make much more in gate income. No way they can have ffp problems.

I am sure all these attacks on our club is also a plan for them to try to keep away big sponsors away from City painting us in a bad way, like cheaters etc. they dont want sponsors like Nissan and Puma with us. They cant attack those directly only they can attack the arabic ones.

If I would be Mansour I would try to influence some of these big companies in the world with no direct ties to UAE to repace Etihad as our shirt and stadium spinsor for a mindblowing fee.

Someone like Google or Apple to come in and bankroll us a nice spinsorship deal. Would the media dare to attack those like they do with Arabic sponsors?
Imagine the face of Castles, Harris on twitter to read the news of Apple replacing Etihad and its called Apple Stadium for next 10 years for 100m per season.


We should get a Northern sponsor like Hovis or Uncle Joe's Mint Balls ....
 
Real spending aint that bad if they got these 5 players for 5 year contract thats its only an extra 50m expense this season for the transfer fees.
They also sold CR last season for a great fee they made nice profit on his amortisation fee which at that points must have been low having been there for 9 seasons.

Salaries could be an issue but again letting CR go last season alone covers probably Mendy, Militao, Jovic and Rodrigo salary alltogether. While Hazard's salary will be offset with selling james Rodriguez and finally offload Bale and soon they will replace Modric too and they still plan t sell 3-4 other players from the squad or the ones out on loan.

Thed did spend big but its imo not something that would cause them any real FFP problems as long as they get rid of the players they dont need like Bale. And they mae their squad much younger building for the future.

Imagine if we got Kun in 2011 for 35m and now this summer a bid would come in for him for 150m pounds. That would be probably 150m profit straight on our accounts.

You now the cost of one player on 5 year contract if its a high profile player lets say 100m fee and 300kk salary per week plus 10m agent fee. Its 45m pound in first year and 35m each next 4 years.

Simply the Nike-Puma change lets us buy a 100m player every summer while Puma is with us with no negative effect on our accounts.

And Real Madird has higher incomes, better sponsors than we do, also make much more in gate income. No way they can have ffp problems.

I am sure all these attacks on our club is also a plan for them to try to keep away big sponsors away from City painting us in a bad way, like cheaters etc. they dont want sponsors like Nissan and Puma with us. They cant attack those directly only they can attack the arabic ones.

If I would be Mansour I would try to influence some of these big companies in the world with no direct ties to UAE to repace Etihad as our shirt and stadium spinsor for a mindblowing fee.

Someone like Google or Apple to come in and bankroll us a nice spinsorship deal. Would the media dare to attack those like they do with Arabic sponsors?
Imagine the face of Castles, Harris on twitter to read the news of Apple replacing Etihad and its called Apple Stadium for next 10 years for 100m per season.

Can see the headline now “City rotten to the core - Apple sponsorship announced”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top