I can't stand Adrian Durham. I know he's a WUM and I know he just tries to get a reaction for listeners to call in but he's just so argumentative. Even when callers have a valid point and Durham is wrong, he'll twist it and talk over the caller to make them look wrong.
That being said, he's one of the only presenters to have a good word to say about City. Maybe he does that to wind listeners up too, but he seems fair when it comes to us and often compliments us.
Yes, I know that. I've nothing against him being controversial to entice callers. But when he is argumentative and never wrong it's petty and annoying.Durham is good at his job - which is taking the opposite view (of whatever, doesn't matter) deliberately in order to get lots of listeners to ring up frothing at the mouth and fill TalkSport's coffers with phone and advertising revenue.
Durham is good at his job - which is taking the opposite view (of whatever, doesn't matter) deliberately in order to get lots of listeners to ring up frothing at the mouth and fill TalkSport's coffers with phone and advertising revenue.
But he's still a ginge ;-)He's different person when you listen to him at the weekend when he's hosting the score updates from across the country
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Sir Danny of Mills...........
Can't believe I didn't win you over with Mills but alright, I'll take another swing.........A decent effort but as thick as Mills undoubtedly is, Saunders is just on a different level.
Can't believe I didn't win you over with Mills but alright, I'll take another swing.........
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Sir Michael of Owen
WioCloser but Saunders still for me.
Sir Sexpest Stanley of Collymore