Exactly! Now you get it.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter RichardDunneOwnGoal
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
Exactly!
That said, I personally don't care about libs being owned. I care more that unemployment in the black community is down. I care more about cuts to dumb programs that serve no one and harm many more. Including those who those programs claim to help.
Whether someone feels "owned" is really tfucking irrelevant. I can give 2 fucks either way.
Exactly. The ends justify the means. We are right back where we started months ago.
Incidentally, African-American homeownership rates are where they were in the early 70s, right after the Fair Housing Act was passed.
You obviously weren't using what information was available.Again, I have no interest in putting anything on Trump's actions. Just using what information is available.
If I told you that "The European powers will despise us because we have no better material out of which to make a President" was the available information about Trump would that be enough for you to form an opinion about him?
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
Trump challenge:
Go to work in the morning and carry out the following list of tasks:
1. Tell a person of colour to 'go back where they came from'.
2. Find a disabled co-worker and mock them for being disabled.
3. Grab a female co-worker by the p*ssy.
4. Call a female co-worker a 'horse face' and a 'dog'.
Try and make it until lunch time before you are 'escorted from the premises'.
If you are unwilling to carry out this challenge, then you clearly know each one of these acts are wrong. Strange how so many Americans know these things are wrong, but still vote for someone who has either said these things, or admitted to doing them on camera.
Go to work in the morning and carry out the following list of tasks:
1. Tell a person of colour to 'go back where they came from'.
2. Find a disabled co-worker and mock them for being disabled.
3. Grab a female co-worker by the p*ssy.
4. Call a female co-worker a 'horse face' and a 'dog'.
Try and make it until lunch time before you are 'escorted from the premises'.
If you are unwilling to carry out this challenge, then you clearly know each one of these acts are wrong. Strange how so many Americans know these things are wrong, but still vote for someone who has either said these things, or admitted to doing them on camera.
M
M
mat
Guest
Trump is a ****.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,603
Yes, ie they won’t give a fuck so long as he’s in power, they’ll simply ignore what they need to ignore.Exactly! Now you get it.
Okay, what other information on her do you have?You obviously weren't using what information was available.
If I told you that "The European powers will despise us because we have no better material out of which to make a President" was the available information about Trump would that be enough for you to form an opinion about him?
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
There is an abundance of information out there if people are willing to trawl and filter.Okay, what other information on her do you have?
All the information that Trump's base supporters ever want is available on Faux News and anti-Dem Russian Bot social media feeds. Notice the word 'want' and not 'need'.
I noticed you didn't answer the question, but ok. :)There is an abundance of information out there if people are willing to trawl and filter.
All the information that Trump's base supporters ever want is available on Faux News and anti-Dem Russian Bot social media feeds. Notice the word 'want' and not 'need'.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
In fairness, your question wasn't addressed to me. ;-)I noticed you didn't answer the question, but ok. :)
Fair enough. :)In fairness, your question wasn't addressed to me. ;-)
I'll dig around myself.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 21,511
Exactly!
That said, I personally don't care about libs being owned. I care more that unemployment in the black community is down. I care more about cuts to dumb programs that serve no one and harm many more. Including those who those programs claim to help.
Whether someone feels "owned" is really tfucking irrelevant. I can give 2 fucks either way.
Oh I don’t know. Not even a tiny bit?
As for cuts to programs, what you guys need to do is chop a few hundred billion off the bloated defence program and divert the funds to a Medicare for all program in every state. It’s win all round. What’s not to like.
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
Trump challenge:
Go to work in the morning and carry out the following list of tasks:
1. Tell a person of colour to 'go back where they came from'.
2. Find a disabled co-worker and mock them for being disabled.
3. Grab a female co-worker by the p*ssy.
4. Call a female co-worker a 'horse face' and a 'dog'.
Try and make it until lunch time before you are 'escorted from the premises'.
If you are unwilling to carry out this challenge, then you clearly know each one of these acts are wrong. Strange how so many Americans know these things are wrong, but still vote for someone who has either said these things, or admitted to doing them on camera.
This behavior makes “libs” angry, so it makes his supporters gleeful. Or it never happened and “libs” are misinterpreting it. Or it’s not really important because “the economy”, because “the Supreme Court”, because “illegal immigration”, etc. so it’s worth tolerating because those things are “more important.” Or “what about” when some other person did the same.
Have I about covered it?
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,603
Surely it’s “I couldn’t give two fucks”!?!I can give 2 fucks either way.
If you could give fucks, then you care, obviously.
Never understood why Americans always get that the wrong way around.
This guy explains (3 mins):
Oh I don’t know. Not even a tiny bit?
As for cuts to programs, what you guys need to do is chop a few hundred billion off the bloated defence program and divert the funds to a Medicare for all program in every state. It’s win all round. What’s not to like.
I'm with you on. The defense spending. Cut that shit. Or repurpose it for actual dangers of the future (cyber, AI, and information Intel). But I'm not with you on spending the money. Our Government is shit at spending money. :(
Surely it’s “I couldn’t give two fucks”!?!
If you could give fucks, then you care, obviously.
Never understood why Americans always get that the wrong way around.
This guy explains (3 mins):
Lol. I appreciate you :)
Surely it’s “I couldn’t give two fucks”!?!
If you could give fucks, then you care, obviously.
Never understood why Americans always get that the wrong way around.
This guy explains (3 mins):
On a side note, what do you guys call Sidewalks? And what's the problem with "research" and "benard" "tidbits" and all.:)
Okay, what other information on her do you have?
Seriously?
Your "facts" are "as described by the convicted criminal" and they are minimised. What you believe is heavily influenced by your desire to put a gloss on Trump's actions.
Other than "she didn't meet all the criteria" I can't find why she was not given clemency under Obama when thousands were (and you didn't stop to ask). Maybe she should have been and I am not defending the sentencing policy of the USA.
But that is the issue. Obama set up a system to look at cases using set criteria. Trump intervened personally on the sole criterion that a political ally asked him to, but is leaving thousands more to rot in prison (you've highlighted Johnson's own words on that).
She was a first-time offender but had committed thousands of offences before being caught. And as for her offences being non-violent, here's Trump's view: “If you shoot one person, they give you life, they give you the death penalty. These [drug dealers] can kill 2,000, 3,000 people, and nothing happens to them.”
Johnson was convicted for being the leader in an operation distributing two to three tons of cocaine.
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/6/6/17434760/trump-alice-johnson-pardon-kim-kardashian
I rarely resort to highlighting/shouting, but:
COMMUTATIONS BY OBAMA: 1,715
COMMUTATIONS BY TRUMP: 2
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,603
Pavement.On a side note, what do you guys call Sidewalks? And what's the problem with "research" and "benard" "tidbits" and all.:)
Ah! I knew that :) Damn. Things I've forgotten.Pavement.
Legally, it's a "footway". The road is the "carriageway". Together (or either) they are "highways".On a side note, what do you guys call Sidewalks? And what's the problem with "research" and "benard" "tidbits" and all.:)
Anyway, how's the search going for more information about Trump and drug dealers?
It's the hypocrisy - bringing Alice Johnson as a guest to the State of the Union when he'd criticised Obama for letting so many out of jail. 'Some of these people are bad dudes. And these are people who are out, they're walking the streets. Sleep tight, folks.'
And I've been reluctant to post this because I believe in rehabilitation of offenders and I don't know why under Obama's clemency program she was refused, but as you've been silly about this, I might as well.
https://thefederalist.com/2018/06/0...-johAnsons-Acrimes-wrong-deserved-punishment/
If you get 404, google -
The Characterization Of Alice Johnson's Crimes The Federalist
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.