And yet human nature is mostly change resistant. Strange isn’t it? I guess it’s a numbers game. The acceptance of political change is determined by how good or bad you feel about the status quo.
We've out civilised ourselves.
This is something that I've been thinking about a lot over the past few years but I'm starting to think that the mass spike in depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues might be related not only to better diagnostics but also to how we have moved too far away from our evolutionary boundaries too quickly.
One of my favourite concepts that Carl Sagan put forward in his books was the idea that human evolution still impacts our psychology every day today. Specifically, he wrote about the notion that humans are the type of species who REQUIRE a frontier in order to function properly - whether that frontier be the horizon or the ocean or the Moon. We don't have any frontiers any more; the whole Earth has been explored, space technology is hundreds of years away from any sort of exploratory missions, and we've crossed every ocean on the planet. Sagan postulated that this has left a deep malaise and depression on the human species, but in a sort of ghostly way. We know there's something wrong with how our society is but we just can't nail it down.
We have access to an almost unlimited amount of information now through the internet. The human brain is not designed to have unlimited access to information; pleasure hormones are sent off to the brain when you learn something new - probably a technique used evolutionary to benefit those who learned new techniques or wisened old knowledge about how or where to hunt. With unlimited access to information, we've killed that hormonal response to some degree as we build chemical resistance to it. Now we're not so much about learning, we're about "having learned". Junkies for the fix of being informed but without the time to dedicate to the learning process. We cannot process the amount of information that the world spits at us every day now through the media, social media and modern civilization. The only way we're learning to survive this neurological onslaught is by literally ignoring vast swathes of an issue in order to try and take on some level of understanding of it.
When a politician comes along and talks about "change" it inspires all of us. There's not a person reading this that doesn't understand that the world or perhaps society or perhaps people are broken, this isn't the way things are supposed to be. We're not meant to live the lives that we live, shackled to the capitalist system or nations or politics living in metropolis sized cities and working in cubicles all day. But there's also not a person reading this that deep down doesn't understand exactly WHAT is wrong, only that something is. We don't have solutions to the eternal mystery of modern civilization - why are we like this when we could have been better?
This is why politicians talk about change - it talks to something inside us that we yearn for but cannot verbalise nor identify. If they said "lower taxes" or "we'll become communist" or something then you'd have opinions on those because they're concrete solutions. However by keeping it vague they're talking about exorcising Sagan's Ghost without actually saying how it will be achieved.