UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a disgraceful piece but not surprising from the on-line media outlet.

According to Tony Evans (who?) of the so called The Independent " Uefa are certain of City’s guilt ". Like young Miguel, he seems to want to make a name for his owners and their distortions.
Just don't post links to Deranged Delaney's Saudi/Russian propaganda site
 
Pretty sure Evans is a Liverpool fan, a big fat bastard if memory serves. File with the other nodding donkeys
Tony 'I'm a Scouse nationalist' Evans. He doesn't believe they're English but is quite happy to see them act like parasites claiming an English place in the champions league. He's every reason, with a good few more thrown in, as to why most of the country despise Liverpool.
 
Wasnt or isnt tony evans the liverpool fan representative or sonething similar? Very vocal but kept quiet when that racist **** marty mullen was chucking asian people in the fountain in barcelona. Mates apparently
 
Wasnt or isnt tony evans the liverpool fan representative or sonething similar? Very vocal but kept quiet when that racist **** marty mullen was chucking asian people in the fountain in barcelona. Mates apparently

Different person. But a bloke who is very vocal in support of the JFT96 campaign and also very vocal against the conservatives.

Tony Barrett is their Head of Supporter Liason. I've had a number of run-ins with him....
 
Wasnt or isnt tony evans the liverpool fan representative or sonething similar? Very vocal but kept quiet when that racist **** marty mullen was chucking asian people in the fountain in barcelona. Mates apparently

Hadn't heard about the fountain stuff, but the fan rep is a different former Times journalist, Tony Barrett. Evans is pushing this UEFA angle in a big way and I'd wager that his source comes from within Liverpool FC. He's also writing about the possibility of a European super league being formed under the auspices of UEFA and has more than once banged on about us potentially being excluded if we have a long ban as a result of FFP breaches. I get the feeling that he wants it to happen.
 
This is a disgraceful piece but not surprising from the on-line media outlet.

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...nts-group-stage-uefa-ban-latest-a9083116.html


According to Tony Evans (who?) of the so called The Independent " Uefa are certain of City’s guilt ". Like young Miguel, he seems to want to make a name for his owners and their distortions.
Fuck me, that’s an appalling piece, even by their standards. I’d expect our legal team to be all over that. Disgraceful.
 
This is a disgraceful piece but not surprising from the on-line media outlet.

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...nts-group-stage-uefa-ban-latest-a9083116.html


According to Tony Evans (who?) of the so called The Independent " Uefa are certain of City’s guilt ". Like young Miguel, he seems to want to make a name for his owners and their distortions.
What an absolute bitter vile **** Tony Evans is, how can you get away with writing such bitter biased shite in a supposed reputable newspaper. Oh yeah, because he's a scouse bastard that's why.
 
This is a disgraceful piece but not surprising from the on-line media outlet.

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...nts-group-stage-uefa-ban-latest-a9083116.html


According to Tony Evans (who?) of the so called The Independent " Uefa are certain of City’s guilt ". Like young Miguel, he seems to want to make a name for his owners and their distortions.
This piece is a disgrace and it shows precisely why Tony Evans is now working for a small readership website instead of his previous position at The Times. He says UEFA are certain "City are guilty" which suggests he either knows nothing about the background to the case or has other motives for writing it. It has been widely reported abroad that the investigation into the person who hacked City's emails (as well as millions of other documents) has been ramped up. The hacker Rui Pinto is now being investigated for hacking Goverment officials, football clubs, and even the police and anti-corruption officers who have been investigating him. He has been accused of trying to extort money out of organisations he has hacked. How the hell can UEFA or anyone for that matter "be certain" that City are guilty of anything?
This story is just another smear. Evans has written it in way that implies that Arsenal are his source but given his strong links to a certain club at the end of the M62 I am pretty sure where the poison for this article has come from. Where is the balance, fairness, and context? Where are the quotes from the other side of this story? He should be ashamed of himself.
 
Last edited:
This piece is a disgrace and it shows precisely why Tony Evans is now working for a small readership website instead of his previous position at The Times. He says UEFA are certain "City are guilty" which suggests he either knows nothing about the background to the case or has other motives for writing it. It has been widely reported abroad that the investigation into the person who hacked City's emails (as well as millions of other documents) has been ramped up. The hacker Ruis Pinto is now being investigated for hacking Goverment officials, football clubs, and even the police and anti-corruption officers who have been investigating him. He has been accused of trying to extort money out of organisations he has hacked. How the hell can UEFA or anyone for that matter "be certain" that City are guilty of anything?
This story is just another smear. Evans has written it in way that implies that Arsenal are his source but given his strong links to a certain club at the end of the M62 I am pretty sure where the poison for this article has come from. Where is the balance, fairness, and context? Where are the quotes from the other side of this story? He should be ashamed of himself.
Ashamed of nothing as per the dip Bible.
 
This piece is a disgrace and it shows precisely why Tony Evans is now working for a small readership website instead of his previous position at The Times. He says UEFA are certain "City are guilty" which suggests he either knows nothing about the background to the case or has other motives for writing it. It has been widely reported abroad that the investigation into the person who hacked City's emails (as well as millions of other documents) has been ramped up. The hacker Ruis Pinto is now being investigated for hacking Goverment officials, football clubs, and even the police and anti-corruption officers who have been investigating him. He has been accused of trying to extort money out of organisations he has hacked. How the hell can UEFA or anyone for that matter "be certain" that City are guilty of anything?
This story is just another smear. Evans has written it in way that implies that Arsenal are his source but given his strong links to a certain club at the end of the M62 I am pretty sure where the poison for this article has come from. Where is the balance, fairness, and context? Where are the quotes from the other side of this story? He should be ashamed of himself.

Rui Pinto expedited from Hungary on a European arrest warrant is now in Portugal on pre-trial investigation, last six months and is due to expire soon although in a complex case can be extended

http://josimarfootball.com/the-portuguese-case-against-rui-pinto/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top