Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just watching this on Ch4 catch up - the Remainers are just getting slaughtered by Redwood and Phillips - zero intellectual integrity or indeed coherence from Blackwood & Lewis or the plants in the audience yelling about water supplies, tax havens, imperialism .. The host is as usual a blatant propagandist for extreme left.

They repeated official civil service information, whether you choose to believe it is up to you.
Also rees -mogg fracios etc are living in some imperialistic fantasy world where we are still some world power, we ain't
 
Really - you haven't heard the countless people say this in interviews ( most born post 1945 I must say ) - you haven't seen reference to it in here? Rascal was even quoting Finton O'Toole espousing that very theory that we are like we are because "we stood alone". And that quote was from only a few posts back
https://www.indy100.com/article/brexit-second-world-war-argument-leave-geoffrey-boycott-8972521
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ry-leadership-elections-romford-a8991441.html
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Eur...-s-history-How-the-myth-of-WWII-shaped-Brexit
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...-war-the-politicians-comparing-brexit-to-wwii

Just a few examples of others saying it that have passed you by - including JRM and Johnson
The reference to Britain standing alone comes from the moment that we were the only European nation left (at war) that had not been invaded by axis forces (except for the Channel Islands). It doesn't mean we claim to have won the war ourselves which is what you wrote and have suggested is a myth.
 
Yeah, I think it's brinkmanship on his part. It's risky because the clock is ticking towards October 31st and he's insisted we're leaving then with or without a deal, so yet another extension seems to be out of the window.

What would be the options on the ballot paper for you if there were another referendum? Would it be a straightforward in or out as before, or various other options such as out with no deal and out with a deal?

To be honest, I can't see a way out of this at the moment. The country is completely split over this issue but I do think many people on both sides are sick of hearing about it and just want a situation where we can all move on. Another referendum would cause serious ructions. And it's not as black and white as Leavers v Remainers either. My boss at work is a pretty staunch Remainer and still wishes the vote had gone a different way but is now at the stage where he wants us out as soon as possible so we all know where we stand, even if it were without a deal. I voted to leave but I'm probably less receptive to no deal than he is. Not that he wants no deal as such, but just wants an end to it all.

Leaving with no deal doesn’t end anything. It’s the start of endless negotiations with the EU. All you do by leaving with no deal is end the legal cover (transition) under which we were due to start..endless negotiations with the EU.

I get the attraction of it all being over but it will never be over. This is what we voted for.
 
Grieve looking happy and ready to extract his next rabbit - Bercow's gang are not going to allow the government to seek a dissolution in the event their coup succeeds..democracy in action preventing a General Election

You mean we don’t get a GE because it doesn’t meet the threshold under the terms of the Fixed Term Act? Do we no longer want MPs and the Executive to adhere to the law?
 
Leaving with no deal doesn’t end anything. It’s the start of endless negotiations with the EU. All you do by leaving with no deal is end the legal cover (transition) under which we were due to start..endless negotiations with the EU.

I get the attraction of it all being over but it will never be over. This is what we voted for.

Yes, I'm fully aware of that. My point was that we need an end to the current limbo - be it with a deal or the more unpalatable no deal. Then we can all move on to the next step.
 
The reference to Britain standing alone comes from the moment that we were the only European nation left (at war) that had not been invaded by axis forces (except for the Channel Islands). It doesn't mean we claim to have won the war ourselves which is what you wrote and have suggested is a myth.
*cough*
 
You mean we don’t get a GE because it doesn’t meet the threshold under the terms of the Fixed Term Act? Do we no longer want MPs and the Executive to adhere to the law?
In doing so a defeated executive cannot call an election and becomes the puppet of the Speaker. He has unconstitutionally and undemocratically allowed the order for parliamentary business to be hijacked by a coalition of wreckers.
 
No, Cameron's government and the Labour opposition both agreed to abide by the referendum outcome in 2016, both their manifestos in 2017 repeated and reinforced that commitment and Article 50 is an EU treaty setting the day of our exit on 31 October, deal or no deal, voted for by 498 to 114. Not semantics just the plain truth - you lost but that doesn't matter it seems.

The Cameron Govt has been replaced twice. Labour committed in their manifesto in 2017 to only leave with a deal. If a week is a long time in politics then three plus years is an eternity. Events, dear boy, events.
 
You know what really pisses me off;
That James O’Brien still has brexiters phoning in with the ‘take our sovereignty back’ mularkey. Of course in the space of four questions O’Brien makes them look vacuous. Tony was the latest this morning. EU was a cancer imposing laws on us. What laws? Hand towels and car emissions was the only ones he could list although not in any detail. Oh, and dissolving the Army. I know not every brexiter is stupid, but jeez why cant just one with some intelligent rationale phone in?
 
Great Britain is truly exceptional in many historic respects and one is not cowering in front of bullies - just remind me who was travelling on Swedish railways during WW2, or who supplied the iron for the Ruhr armaments factories.

I think comparisons to WW2 and bullying are extremely far-fetched and are purely designed to drive nationalism.

I've had this argument at work, confusing Brexit as a patriotic act is one of the major miscalculations of people in the referendum.

The UK is not being bullied because we are leaving the EU under our own steam. We cannot reasonably expect to enjoy the same benefits of a member state whilst not being a member state.

If Scotland leaves the UK, would we expect Scotland to be given all the benefits, a free trade deal etc? Of course not because it is a consequence, it isn't bullying.

WW2 was not about bullying, it was a existential threat to peace and wellbeing around the world. It required countries to sacrifice and work together to defeat the common threat.

Leaving the EU in its most basic form is the total opposite of what WW2 represented.
 
Yes, I'm fully aware of that. My point was that we need an end to the current limbo - be it with a deal or the more unpalatable no deal. Then we can all move on to the next step.

The current situation is unsustainable but it is being sustained because the alternatives have been deemed unacceptable. The WA is considered by both Remain and Leave as unacceptable and a no deal exit simply hands whatever leverage we have left back to the EU. Johnson seems to be gambling on the EU granting a raft of mini deals to keep the country running. All these mini deals will be in the gift of the EU, time limited and come at a price.

A no deal exit is simply an admission of defeat.
 
Yes, I'm fully aware of that. My point was that we need an end to the current limbo - be it with a deal or the more unpalatable no deal. Then we can all move on to the next step.
How does it move us onto the next step? It's the same step. Negotiating a deal, but from a weaker position.
 
You know what really pisses me off;
That James O’Brien still has brexiters phoning in with the ‘take our sovereignty back’ mularkey. Of course in the space of four questions O’Brien makes them look vacuous. Tony was the latest this morning. EU was a cancer imposing laws on us. What laws? Hand towels and car emissions was the only ones he could list although not in any detail. Oh, and dissolving the Army. I know not every brexiter is stupid, but jeez why cant just one with some intelligent rationale phone in?
He's probably one of the best and most intelligent proponents of remain out there. If he could only direct his efforts into winning converts rather than just arguments he'd be truly great. Sadly his frustration with the stupidity of anyone who doesn't agree with him colours his approach and negates his impact. The tragedy of this is he then ends up like Farage, just preaching to the hardcore.
 
The current situation is unsustainable but it is being sustained because the alternatives have been deemed unacceptable. The WA is considered by both Remain and Leave as unacceptable and a no deal exit simply hands whatever leverage we have left back to the EU. Johnson seems to be gambling on the EU granting a raft of mini deals to keep the country running. All these mini deals will be in the gift of the EU, time limited and come at a price.

A no deal exit is simply an admission of defeat.

No doubt if No Deal happens there will be a big impact and not a positive one either, but taking No Deal off the table during negotiations with the EU isn't a wise idea IMO. I said earlier that I don't believe Johnson wants us out without a deal - he wants us out with a better deal than May's deal.
 
Great Britain is truly exceptional in many historic respects and one is not cowering in front of bullies - just remind me who was travelling on Swedish railways during WW2, or who supplied the iron for the Ruhr armaments factories.

This country does indeed have a proud history.It should be remembered and celebrated,not used to divide.
Another myth we choose to believe - if we stood alone were all those soldiers, sailors and airmen from France, Belgium, Holland, Poland, the Commonwealth and the USA who fought with the UK and gave their lives in conflict not there then? All those war memorials to their fallen erected by mistake? Its the dangerous " are British/English and we won two world wars " merchants that are a blight on the true value of the achievements of a collective.

I find it sad.
All the sacrifices the fallen made during both wars and their sacrifices are still being used by people attempting to win an argument on the internet.

History is meant to be used to learn from our successes as well as our mistakes.
Seemingly we often don't learn.
 
Indeed.

I'm not for divide and conquer.

For as much as I'll want to remain we are now beyond the point of no return.

Just make sure we get some sort of a deal.
Putting your passion to one side and thinking objectively and calmly....

Do you genuinely think that if the UK leaves the EU at the end of October that it will increase the prospect of Scotland leaving the UK?

If so - why?

Remember - putting the emotion to one side
 
In doing so a defeated executive cannot call an election and becomes the puppet of the Speaker. He has unconstitutionally and undemocratically allowed the order for parliamentary business to be hijacked by a coalition of wreckers.

A PM and executive can only exercise power through Parliament. It can only do this if it has a majority. If it has no majority it has limited power and if it has lost control of its own party (which it has) it has no power to dictate events via Parliament whatsoever. What it can do is suspend Parliament hence the charge of ‘coup’ levied against Johnson.

Parliament is pushing back against this but can only do so if a majority of its members vote to do so. That is MPs we elect voting to check (or not) what they regard as an executive gone rogue. This may be unconventional but it is not unconstitutional nor is it undemocratic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top