Metal Biker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 22,586
- Team supported
- Manchester City (and McLaren F1)
Which is exactly the point i've been raising and the reason she got a lot of groans from the panel and the audience.i haven't seen anyone on here make the point, but playing devil's advocate, i can see the annoyance with negotiating a deal and then campaigning for remain - what's the motivation to get a good deal if you don't want people to vote for it.
However, I 100% back Labour's position on this in the sense that any deal, no deal and remain should be put back to the people to decide.
People can back her on this, absolutely, but people can also now finally see that she only wants people to think she wants to get a brexit deal, and wants people to vote for her in a GE on that basis. In reality, she has revealed that whatever deal she would reach, she wouldn't support it. It's all been rhetoric to gain votes and support in a GE from leave voters in an effort to pull the wool over their eyes for them to gain power. Thornberry does not have leave voters best intentions at heart, and Bruce managed to expose it, finally.
It's been a criticism of Thornberry's position, not Labour's itself. We're saying "be honest Labour MP's; you DON'T support a soft brexit, you support a NO brexit, but you're trying to make out that you DO support a brexit deal to gain our support". Why would leave voters vote for a brexit deal in a referendum, knowing full well that Labour themselves arranged this deal without even supporting it?