Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't say it's 'dominated' by the right wing, it's just the same ones who keep posting & pretty much all of them would disagree.

Most right wing people don't know what right wing is & think half the Tory party falls under that banner.

When you see Theresa May as a bit of a softy Liberal, you are seriously fucked.
What is quite amusing is that those that come across on here as particularly right wing mostly describe themselves as centrist yet are so balanced in their judgment that they have admitted to either voting for Farage's "party" in the EuroParl election or have indicated that they haven't ruled out voting for him in a GE, or both.
 
Whats really amusing is posters taking one subject, brexit and then claiming anyone that disagrees with them are right wing.

That's amusing!
Most people who want brexit do tend to be on the right wing though, as has been shown time and time again, so your post is completely pointless. It's a bit like kicking off that people assume anything that woofs is a dog.
 
Most people who want brexit do tend to be on the right wing though, as has been shown time and time again, so your post is completely pointless. It's a bit like kicking off that people assume anything that woofs is a dog.

Of course my post is pointless......you dont agree with it.

Voted Labour all my life yet agree that we should leave the EU as per the result of the EU ref and according to Bluemoon i am now a rabid right winger.
 
As it is I think it has already begun to come apart. Regardless of whether we leave or not 17 odd million people went to the polls and declared it a crock of shit. Thats without taking into account the rise of extreme political groups left and right across the continent, then we have increasingly terminal divides in not just our country but several others including France and Germany.

Then of course there is increasing economic gloom in Europe which is hardly surprising as three countries cannot carry several others who simply have not got the same capacity as others.

As it heads to more federalisation there increases the risk of conflict with Russia.

The EU aims to change and control how people of all kinds of nationality and ethnic, political and religious leanings live their lives. The clear signs that across Europe are against that are being ignored and something will give.

I have yet to hear one argument outlining how the EU can make countries as different as France Germany, Bulgaria, Albania (i know but it wont be long) all live and work under the same set of rules. It is inevitably failing.

17m went to the polls and did not declare it a crock of shit, they expressed a desire to leave. A similar, although slightly smaller amount of people went to the polls and expressed a desire to remain even if they thought it was a crock of shit. A crock of shit was never on the ballot paper and a significant number of people for whatever reason didnt even vote for or against this apparent crock of shit. That is the problem with referendum, people vote for imaginary crocks of shit or against imaginary crocks of shit rather than for positions that are believable and reasonable. There is increasing Economic gloom across the world, not just the EU this has much to do with Sino-USA trade war and the American bond markets reflect that, it has a negative yield curve which is a predictor of a world wide recession, not just an EU recession. Of course larger economies support smaller ones, London supports the UK economy for instance as its the dominant factor in the UK. The areas on the periphery should in theory benefit from London's wealth creation, that it does not is not the fault of the EU it is the fault of the UK government and its London/South East centric policies. They acknowledged that by producing the northern powerhouse policy. That it has been a damp squib is the fault of the UK not the EU. There has been a staggering rise in the far right across Europe, mainly down to the fears of immigration. This is classic Alt-right terrority and fear of the unknown is easily exploited for political gain. Farage and his infamous poster based on Nazi propaganda was a huge factor in raising tensions, as was Mays send them home buses. The lack of understanding around immigration is shocking in this country and the demonisation of immigrants is nothing short of disgusting. That we helped this create this problem is overlooked and we have not taken responsibilty for our actions.

There is no indication that we are heading towards more federalisation, which is a shame as i would welcome it, why would it increase tensions with Russia, they have enough of their own issues and Putin is under pressure at home. The fear of Russian Bear is cold war stuff, the cold war is past history and Russia IMHO should at some point be welcomed into the EU.

How exactly are the EU changing the way people live, their ethnic and religious leanings? What are these clear plans? Perhaps you could explain this to us. Please don't answer with any ridiculous reference to the White Nationalist,anti semite, Count Coudenhove -Kalergi

As for your last point, the UK has managed to live together for centuries, it has a single currency, it has a Parliament albeit with new regional parliaments, we live under virtually the same laws. We have a single armed forces, freedom of movement, rights to language are followed, The UK used that model to become the premier nation in the world, it works. It is only now with the rise of the far right that this is being challenged. We have English nationalism on the rise and therein lies the problem. The USA also lives under a similarish system, one of 50 different states with a common central government, a single currency and armed forces. It is proven the model can work as the USA is the most powerful nation in the world. Europe has prospered for 50 years under the EU/EEC it is not the finished article and there is much that can be improved but it works for the simple reason there has not been a European war of significance since 1945 and that has to count for something on a continent that has been ravaged by war for generations. Yes there can be improvements to the EU, it could be more democratic for a start, but it is a young project and it will evolve in time given the support it needs.

This is from somebody who did not vote remain, but from a person who is getting really annoyed at the misinformation being used to achieve a political end. It is something straight out of the Goebbels play book.

1/ Don't bother trying to persuade the intellectuals, just sway the undereducated lumpemproletariat.
2/ Appeal to them via emotional triggers rather than specific detailed ideas
3/ If anyone questions your lies call them unpatriotic traitors.

There are noble reasons to leave the EU and their are noble reasons to remain in the EU, it is a shame the debate has plumbed the depths it has, the nationalistic hubris and the amount of unrequited lies has distorted the debate to such an extent it has divided the country in a way the country has never been divided before.
 
Whats really amusing is posters taking one subject, brexit and then claiming anyone that disagrees with them are right wing.

That's amusing!
Assuming you were responding to my point, you are a case in point. You bang on about being a life long labour voter yet you have admitted to voting for Farage who leads an undeniably far right grouping.
 
Of course my post is pointless......you dont agree with it.

Voted Labour all my life yet agree that we should leave the EU as per the result of the EU ref and according to Bluemoon i am now a rabid right winger.
I said 'most', not all, and if I was to go off your posts on here I would describe you as a pretty full on right winger. And I'm afraid if you jump into bed with the right wing, don't complain when you realise you've got their crap on your pyjamas when they shit the bed (brexit was only ever a right wing enterprise, it was the right wing of the tory party who initiated it).
 
Of course my post is pointless......you dont agree with it.

Voted Labour all my life yet agree that we should leave the EU as per the result of the EU ref and according to Bluemoon i am now a rabid right winger.
No because anyone who would vote for Farage must be by definition.
 
Assuming you were responding to my point, you are a case in point. You bang on about being a life long labour voter yet you have admitted to voting for Farage who leads an undeniably far right grouping.

On one single subject matter....brexit, to enable us to leave the EU.

You too are a case in point.
 
I said 'most', not all, and if I was to go off your posts on here I would describe you as a pretty full on right winger. And I'm afraid if you jump into bed with the right wing, don't complain when you realise you've got their crap on your pyjamas when they shit the bed (brexit was only ever a right wing enterprise, it was the right wing of the tory party who initiated it).

I didn't jump into bed with anyone.

I was asked a question by parliament and i gave my answer.

You not liking it or the fact a majority agreed with my has left you wanting to label and put people into boxes to help denigrate and claim some form of moral high ground.
 
I am asking a question about any possible second referendum.

Will it be made legally binding beforehand? If so and leave wins we will then finally leave? Will the same politicians refuse yet again to honour the result? If it isn't legally binding but remain wins can leave then play silly games for 3 years?

I am fully aware of the promises made by every politician and party in this country pre ref and the way they gave their parliamentary sovereignty over to the people thanks very much.

Maybe you wasn't?

The key is, to spell out to the electorate, exactly what it is, they are voting for.

The absolutely ridiculous, extremist position taken by some leave voters, that everybody who voted leave, completely ignored the campaign telling them they were voting for A BETTER DEAL with Europe & voted 'just leave' is insulting the intelligence of both sides & is a deliberate lie. Even those who are happy with 'just leave' cannot be stupid enough to believe that all of the 17 million people ignored the campaign promises & instead voted for that, as opposed to 'a deal'. They are lying & pretending & it's a stupid argument.

The whole thing should have been set up, to have a vote on the actual deal reached, not to give a bunch of fanatics the chance to screw the country over.

If enough leavers (& remainers) were happy to accept May's deal & voted on it, Parliament should have then been legally bound to carry that through.

If some who voted leave, are not happy with any achievable deal, then they should vote to cancel the fucking thing.
 
Imho, if leavers want to look at who they should blame for the fact that "Brexit hasn't been concluded yet", then they really ought to put Bojo, Mogg and the ERG crew out there, afterall they could afaik have delivered the majority for May's deal but refused only to present an alternative that now commands less of a majority.
 
What is quite amusing is that those that come across on here as particularly right wing mostly describe themselves as centrist yet are so balanced in their judgment that they have admitted to either voting for Farage's "party" in the EuroParl election or have indicated that they haven't ruled out voting for him in a GE, or both.

Exactly.

And these people actually genuinely believe they are 'centrist'. They are not just saying it for effect.

They don't see much wrong in what Farage & Mogg are getting up to. They will probably still defend him cosying up to the Nazis in Germany & not see anything wrong with it.
 
I am asking a question about any possible second referendum.

Will it be made legally binding beforehand? If so and leave wins we will then finally leave? Will the same politicians refuse yet again to honour the result? If it isn't legally binding but remain wins can leave then play silly games for 3 years?

I am fully aware of the promises made by every politician and party in this country pre ref and the way they gave their parliamentary sovereignty over to the people thanks very much.

Maybe you wasn't?
According to the times, Labour are working on two possible approaches to a 2nd referendum, to be agreed at their conference. The first is to renegotiate followed by a referendum. The second is to hold a referendum ASAP on a very slightly tweaked WA with the main changes confined to the political declaration. The implication was that the 2 nd option is gaining favour.

So if they did make it binding, presumably it would only be the WA? Not the political declaration.

Probably academic since if the referendum is a straight choice between the WA and Remain, Remain will win by a country mile
 
According to the times, Labour are working on two possible approaches to a 2nd referendum, to be agreed at their conference. The first is to renegotiate followed by a referendum. The second is to hold a referendum ASAP on a very slightly tweaked WA with the main changes confined to the political declaration. The implication was that the 2 nd option is gaining favour.

So if they did make it binding, presumably it would only be the WA? Not the political declaration.

Probably academic since if the referendum is a straight choice between the WA and Remain, Remain will win by a country mile

They spend 75% of the time telling us the only deal on offer has already been given and the EU wont renegotiate and 25% of the time telling us they will renegotiate.

They will revoke, as per the memberships instructions but wont be honest about it because they know with a GE coming up they will suffer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top